Click to enlarge

The Indian Village in Yosemite National Park has signs describing life in the Valley before whites entered. Here is just one of many. All signs are in Southern and Central Miwok languages, not one is the original indigenous language of the first Native people of Yosemite, the Paiutes, giving visiting tourists the wrong impression of who were the first people of Yosemite. Central Mewuks were never in Yosemite Valley. Where are the signs with Paiute, the language of the real Ahwahneechees?

Tools

Where is the Yosemite Indian language?

by yosemitepaiutes (Subscribe)

Posted on: Jan 22, 2010 at 9:08 AM EDT

Channel: News

Location: Yosemite National Park, Yosemite, California, Mariposa County, Mono County, Tuolumne County

Besides our history and culture nothing holds a nation of Native Americans together more than their own language. This is true in every Native American community across the country especially in California and in Yosemite Valley.

Dr. Lafayette H. Bunnell, who was with the Mariposa Battalion led by Major James Savage, documented that Chief Tenaya and his band of Yosemite Ahwahneechees spoke a Paiute jargon. Bunnell wrote members of Tenaya's people spoke Paiute and Mono languages which are culturally related to each other. Both Bunnell and Sam Ward, another early settler in the area, wrote that Major James Savage could speak Miwok, but could not speak Paiute so Savage had to take an interpreter with him to translate to Chief Tenaya and his people. Bunnell described Chief Tenaya as the founder of the Paiute Colony of Ahwahnee. This happened in the spring of 1851. (see second photo in gallery)

A hundred and twenty years later, in the 1970s, Yosemite National Park started several projects to show how the first people of Yosemite lived before the whites entered Yosemite Valley. With the assistance of their new non-Native Indian ethnologist Craig D. Bates the Park contacted the American Indian Council of Mariposa, also known as the Southern Sierra Miwuks, to try to re-create an Indian Village behind the Yosemite Research Library. A Village that would show how the early Yosemite Native people lived. The Park wanted to start the Yosemite Native cultural program before 1851 when the Valley was discovered, but the Miwoks said they wanted to start the Indian history at 1870, some 20 years after the first discovery. Then the Park proceeded to re-create the Indian Village with the assistance of the non-profits Yosemite Fund and the Yosemite Association.

Knowing that the first discovery of Yosemite documented by Dr. Lafayette H. Bunnell you would think that in this new Yosemite Indian Village and the Yosemite Visitor Center you would find signs in Paiute, right? If you believed the Park would have the right language of the original Indians of Yosemite Valley you would be wrong. Instead Yosemite National Park, with the assistance of the Fund and the Association, had signs made in both Southern Sierra Miwuk and Central Mewuk, the latter tribe has never been associated with the Yosemite Valley. Not only did the Park create several signs in the wrong language, they also created pamphlets in the Miwok language and placed them in the Indian Village.

It turns out the Miwoks were not the original Indians of Yosemite. In fact they were the scouts of the white militia and were afraid to enter Yosemite Valley. The Miwoks were afraid of the original inhabitants of Yosemite Valley, the Paiutes, and considered them their enemies.

This brings us to the question that no one at Yosemite National Park can answer; Where is our Paiute language in Yosemite National Park? Since it is documented that the original Native people of Yosemite were Paiutes.

We request that our Paiute language be placed in the Yosemite Indian Village with pamphlets in the original language of the Yosemite Valley Indian people, which was not Miwok, but Paiute.

Yosemite National Park should correct this injustice.

Put the Paiute language back in the Park. The language of the original Yosemite Valley Indian people.

Non Profit Tribes says ...

On Friday, Jan 22 at 11:05 AM

Commenter

Why is the National Park Service working with a non profit tribe called the Southern Sierra Miwoks instead of the Federally Recognized Tribes which surround Yosemite National Park today? Why start the Indian history at they year 1870 instead of 1851?

36127914
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Cathy Lenoir says ...

On Friday, Jan 22 at 5:19 PM

Commenter

It's time to make things right! It's the honorable thing to do and don't wait another 20 years to do it. It's not all about how the whites say it happened is it?

36156657
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

WTF they dumped Chief Tenaya? says ...

On Friday, Jan 22 at 8:10 PM

Commenter

This is a major blunder since we brag up Tenaya Lodge and even we got t wrong based on the Parks history which we now know is WRONG! OMG!

36167627
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

"Huh?" says ...

On Saturday, Jan 23 at 6:13 AM

Commenter

Genocide, anyone?

36184759
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Lets rewrite history? says ...

On Saturday, Jan 23 at 1:37 PM

Commenter

Lets rewrite history said the National Park Service and no one will ever know, unless the American society reads a book, or discovers the truth on the internet. This subject speaks of a lawsuit in my opinion. I had no idea this was going on.

36201944
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Government trashes Paiutes says ...

On Wednesday, Jan 27 at 2:47 PM

Commenter

Why didn't you just write the headlines as The national park service trashes the Paiutes. I dont have any faith the government, my advice get a lawyer and sue them.

36470829
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

To poster above says ...

On Thursday, Jan 28 at 12:25 PM

Commenter

The National Park uses another non-profit "shell" group called the Kutzadika'a Mono Lake Paiutes, that only has about 3 members, to counter balance the truth.

36532544
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Nuwuv rat says ...

On Friday, Jan 29 at 5:59 PM

Commenter

I like that White people write things down, they unknowingly convict themselves of things or leave a written trail of evidence. Writings tell of life, who, what and many other informative details. This confuses me, due 2 bad research maybe? hmmm.....

36635284
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Reno Paiute says ...

On Saturday, Jan 30 at 3:02 PM

Commenter

The First Discovery of Yosemite Book which documents Chief Tenaya was a Mono Lake Paiute, dated 1851. This leads you right back to Yosemite National Park Service and the non profit Southern Sierra Miwoks stating history of Yosemite at 1870.

36682574
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Bobby Castillo says ...

On Monday, Feb 1 at 3:31 PM

Commenter

As a Native American I was proud to be able to go to Yosemite and supervise the restoration of Stoneman Meadow in Yosemite Valley. This is such beautiful land trampled by tourist that needs much care and much more restoration of many areas.

36774924
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Puzzled says ...

On Thursday, Feb 4 at 1:50 AM

Commenter

Many of the Paiute languages have contrasting dialects, which results in some words the same, but most are not. To prove this compare the Northern Paiute to the Southern Paiute. How does the author of the documents distinguish the difference?

36965879
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Why place the Miwok says ...

On Thursday, Feb 4 at 10:55 AM

Commenter

Why place the Miwok language in an Indian Village of the Paiute Chief Tenaya, is a better question? It is a fact that the Lower Yosemite Falls area was Tenaya's Village, yet the park service dug it up with permission from the non profit Miwok corp.

36981469
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Puzzled askes says ...

On Saturday, Feb 6 at 2:13 PM

Commenter

How does the author of the documents distinguish the difference? The Paiute language of Bishop California uses the letter "B" in place of the letter "P." Note the use in the word Pah meaning water, Yet it can also be used as Bah.

37126874
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Nuwuvi rat says ...

On Saturday, Feb 6 at 6:06 PM

Commenter

To Puzzled, so whats your point? All tribes have variations of dialect differences. ur example of water, is the same word use by So. Paiutes and Utes of Utah. sorta a p/b sound.regardless the word is n the old documents that r being written bout abov

37136304
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

lookin for answers says ...

On Sunday, Feb 7 at 3:43 AM

Commenter

if each tribe were nomadic and used yosemite as a summer home then both tribes languages should be put on signs if there is anyone left who knows the names of places in the park. my great grandmother worked there and was paiute and miwok

37153119
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Bunnells Books states says ...

On Sunday, Feb 7 at 3:05 PM

Commenter

Bunnells Books states the Miwoks were afraid to enter the valley because witches and wizards lived there, so when did the Miwoks summer in the Valley? I will say that after Yosemite became a National Park, the Miwoks came into the Park as employees.

37172527
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Puzzled says ...

On Monday, Feb 8 at 3:10 AM

Commenter

Yosemite was there, centuries before Bunnells Book or other 1800's documentation and so were inhabitants. For anyone here to claim recent history as permanent fact needs to be less short-sighted in their perception. The answers need to be excavated.

37196362
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Nuwuvi rat says ...

On Monday, Feb 8 at 12:14 PM

Commenter

gee puzzled, lets apply that short sighted thinking to all written ndn history since "discovery" and see how much much sense that makes. some of us base fed. recognition on written history,etc. regardless, writings are a view to what was happening,

37213324
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Nuwuvi rat says ...

On Monday, Feb 8 at 12:21 PM

Commenter

and... my dear person, puzzled, u r right. However,writings can also reflect bias and other details. Either way, this area sounds to me like its a area that was inhabited by paiutes, I dont care 1 way or another, as I come from a diff part of the SW.

37213792
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Puzzled needs answers lol says ...

On Monday, Feb 8 at 2:22 PM

Commenter

According to the Park Service themselves who stated on Court records the Miwoks arrived in the Park 800 years ago. So explain the uto Aztecan Rock writings dated prior to 800 years? Explain the Owens Valley Brownware excavated from El Portal?

37222679
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Puzzled needs answers lol says ...

On Monday, Feb 8 at 2:27 PM

Commenter

There is no real proof the Miwoks were there 800 years before the park was created. This soil is to acidic for the Feds to determine who was who. However the Feds can get around the Mono Lake Obsidian, Owens Valley Brownware and the 23 skeletons lost

37223044
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

How does one lose 23 skeletons says ...

On Tuesday, Feb 9 at 1:02 PM

Commenter

How does one lose 23 skeletons? Are you telling me the national park service lost Indian remains?

37285519
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

They kept them says ...

On Friday, Feb 12 at 7:25 PM

Commenter

They kept the bones to study just like the Government wants all Indian bones.

37523063
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 250 Characters Left

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.