Story Published:
May 11, 2009
Story Updated:
May 8, 2009
Despite being in the middle of troubled economic times, millions of federal dollars have been made available to help wildlife and habitat.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, working with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announced a series of grants to states for the conservation of imperiled species, land acquisition as part of endangered species conservation, and millions of dollars specifically to Native American tribes for a variety of habitat and wildlife conservation work.
Forty-one Native American tribes in 16 states will receive $7 million in competitive federal grants to undertake a wide variety of conservation projects.
“Tribes manage nearly 100 million acres of land in the U.S., land that provides important habitat for some of our most treasured species,” Salazar said. “This program provides crucial financial support to tribal governments to help them manage and improve their fish and wildlife heritage for the benefit of all. Projects funded by these grants target some of the most imperiled species and habitats in the United States. They’re also among the most effective because they are tied to well-thought-out plans that identify the highest priorities where we can make the biggest difference for imperiled species.”
Since inception of the highly competitive Tribal Wildlife Grants program in 2003, more than $50 million has been awarded to federally recognized Indian tribes, money that allows them to manage, monitor and conserve important fish and wildlife resources.
“FWS and the tribes share strong natural resource stewardship values,” said Benjamin Tuggle, FWS southwest regional director. “It is part of our mission to work with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. We’re pleased to assist in the Tribal Wildlife Grant Program to achieve these goals.”
In May 2008, FWS issued a request for grant proposals to benefit habitat, fish and wildlife including species not hunted or fished. Applications were due in September 2008 and a total of 101 proposals were submitted.
“The Western region is the most competitive because there’s a lot of work being done by tribes,” said FWS Southwest Region Native American Liaison Joe Early, citing an example of an eagle aviary/rehabilitation center unique to the region.
Tribes in Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas have received more than $8 million. Through the program’s first six years, nearly 300 grants were awarded. This year, 101 proposals were submitted with 41 selected for funding.
This year’s funded projects run the gamut of wildlife conservation endeavors, from restoring habitat to conducting wildlife surveys, and from fishery studies to invasive weed management. Individual awards cap at $200,000 maximum. “There tends to be a trend toward habitat restoration in the Western states along with programs to better manage or reintroduce culturally significant species,” Early said.
Last year, the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma received $62,000 to manage its Wildlife Conservation Areas which include Bah Kho-Je Xla Chi, the Grey Snow Eagle House, the first federally-funded eagle rehabilitation facility in the U.S. Aviary Manager Victor Roubidoux has run the facility since 2006, housing eagles that are non-releasable due to injuries and in the process, gathering naturally-molted feathers for distribution to tribal members to use in cultural ceremonies. The Iowa Tribe is the first in the country to be a permitted eagle rehabilitator. This year it was awarded $200,000 to expand its 100-foot-long flight cages and mews (smaller pens) in support of conserving the national symbol.
Additional grants involving eagles included Arizona’s Hopi Tribe, awarded $200,000 to map habitat of eagle prey. The Navajo Nation received $200,000 to monitor the annual occupancy and reproduction of golden eagles on Hopi and Navajo Nation lands during the 2009 reproductive season.
Last year, the Colorado River Indian Tribes of Arizona received nearly $83,000 to protect mesquite bosques that line the banks of the Colorado River and are culturally important to the tribes and biologically important to many migratory birds. This year, the Cocopah Tribe received $130,000 to initiate riparian ecosystem restoration efforts along the Lower Colorado River.
New Mexico’s mule deer and elk are of cultural significance to the Santa Ana Pueblo who received $200,000 to develop a comprehensive management plan for the species.
In Oklahoma, the Osage Nation received $135,000 in funds to re-introduce the Neosho mucket, a state-endangered mussel species historically found on the Osage Reservation. Other funds dedicated to propagation of culturally significant and imperiled freshwater mussels ($190,000) went to the Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma.
“The benefits of these grants go far beyond the dollar amounts involved,” Tuggle said. “The partners in stewardship developed in implementing the grants helps ensure that fish, wildlife and habitat survives and thrives.”
Tuesday, May 12 at 2:26 PM concerned native wrote ...
Mr. Salazar needs to take a good look at the rulings passed by the bush aministration and make some revisions in regard to protection of endangered species. What about the polar bear?
21319227 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Thursday, May 14 at 4:43 PM D. Shay @Sho Ban wrote ...
Tribes must insist that they use their traditional methods of caring for all sacred species. If not, they will be just doing the feds work under the guise of "benefit for all" and I don't think tribes and fed agencies share the same values. Theirs is always money driven.
21519322 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Thursday, May 14 at 5:53 PM Anonymous wrote ...
I agree that Tribes should use their traditional methods of caring for wildlife species. The term "management" many times means killing species. Also the management of Natural Resources can mean categorizing species as pest then allowing them to be killed. Tribes should not take up those practices. Let's stick with our old ways, respect for all living creatures.
21522512 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Tuesday, May 26 at 3:57 PM realistic biologist wrote ...
The selection process for grant awards, needs closer review to ensure fairness of funds distribution and reduce political inplay. The goal of everyone is to develop wildlife management capabilities on all tribal lands, and to develop tribal members to take on these challenges and have the funding to do so.
22691132 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Wednesday, Jun 3 at 1:33 AM Wise One wrote ...
Some tribes have successfully managed Fishery Projects, but at extensive costs, most funding acquired from federal sources, while minimal revenue is generated from sports advocates. In most cases, the federal funding available supports several tribes and may be strapped to fund several others, but not all 500 plus tribes. Wildlife protection and preservation is a complex area, which tribes must plan and train its youth to do, well in advance of actual project funding commitment.
23132369 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Add a comment
Most Popular