Wennersten: There’s something in the water
By
John R. Wennersten
|
| The situation won’t improve unless there is a major public outcry against our rivers becoming toxic chemical waterways. |
For example, Blazer has found male smallmouth bass with both male and female sex organs attempting to lay eggs. Coincidentally, estrogen levels from disposed drugs such as birth control pills and urine from hormone-treated livestock have increased in waters.
In 2003, these disturbing findings were reported in the upper reaches of the Potomac River. Since then, endocrine disruptors and their effects on fish have been reported throughout the mid-Atlantic.
Environmental scientist Eugene P. Macri reports that the Susquehanna is a “toxic soup” with chemicals and endocrine disruptors. Environmental agencies in Pennsylvania have failed to see the cumulative effects of endocrine disruptors in the Susquehanna watershed, Macri argues.
“Contrary to the myth (about the river’s good health). … the Susquehanna is a dying ecosystem.”
These chemicals are rooted in our lifestyle choices,” Blazer said. For example, virtually all personal care products contain phthalates, which cause sex problems in frogs and may damage the workings of the human endocrine system.
Scientists are quick to point out that with new pollutants entering our water systems every day, and we really don’t know what safe levels are.
“This is the dilemma when we look at toxins in the water at parts per billion,” said Dr. Robert Lawrence of the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. “We are beginning to see a disturbing amount of genital abnormalities in male babies and impaired fertility influenced by endocrine disruptors.”
Right now, “the burden of proof is on those who say that levels of endocrine disruptors in the water are too low to be harmful. We need to take into account that humans are long-lived species and endocrine disruptors have a capacity to have synergy with other toxins and become harmful over time. Parents should be very careful in terms of what kind of drinking water they give to their young children.”
| Scientists now tell us there is something in our waters that we least expected – a class of chemicals called endocrine disruptors. |
Lawrence added that we need strict law enforcement procedures for water treatment, not mere monitoring.
“Ten new chemicals per day are being manufactured globally that end up in our water systems. Testing can’t keep up. It’s scary, very scary.”
The situation won’t improve unless there is a major public outcry against our rivers becoming toxic chemical waterways. Unless we firmly control our drinkable, fishable and swimmable waters, we may face frightening consequences as a species. The effects of endocrine disruptors, so evident in fish, can be extrapolated to the human body. Thus in the future impaired waters may in turn lead to impaired people.
John R. Wennersten is the author of numerous books on the Chesapeake Bay and regional environments in the Mid-Atlantic. This column is distributed by Bay Journal News Service.
Classifieds
On Demand
-
Digital Copy
Receive Indian Country Today in digital format Read more »
-
ICT Insider
Sign up to receive ICT Insider E-Newsletters Read more »
-
ICT audio
Listen to audio programs from ICT Read more »
-
Video
Watch ICT videos right in your browser Read more »
-
RSS Feeds
Stay up-to-date with ICT Read more »
-
Mobile
ICT on your cell phone or PDA Read more »
Monday, Mar 1 at 12:03 PM Sun Woman wrote ...
Just imagine when the rivers were clean and the eco-system and bio-diversity thrived their maximum potential. Native people believe that water and plant are spirits. I've drank water that was really quenching and I've drank water that did not quench my thirst, it was like dead water. The Mother Earth is a dynamic being and we really have to unite in stewardship of the irreplacable resources that we were blessed with...
38461446Tuesday, Feb 16 at 11:47 PM Anonymous wrote ...
IF THE CHEMICALS ARE CAUSING GENDER CONFUSION.THEN WHAT`S GOING TO STOP IT.IF IT EFFECTS THE TRIBE THEN ORGANIZED PROTESTS ARE NEEDED.
37724124Monday, Feb 15 at 10:38 AM The Facts wrote ...
The latest, cutting-edge research shows that atrazine has no adverse effect on frogs. In 2007, EPA went so far as to say, "the data are sufficiently robust to outweigh previous efforts to study the potential effects of atrazine on amphibian gonadal development" and "there is no compelling reason to pursue additional testing." "...published epidemiological data provide no support for the carcinogenicity potential of atrazine...it is unlikely that atrazine is an endocrine disruptor in humans." Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority, Final Review Report & Regulatory Decision, Volume 2, 2008
37617293Monday, Feb 15 at 4:55 AM Native NDN wrote ...
Wow, this article explains the social deviance of San Francisco, CA "confused gender" population. The article also defines the fallacies of progress and the ultimate need to restart or give rebirth to this earths life form in another time. The educated man has been led to believe, that he is the center of the universe and knows it all, who must find answers to the many unknowns of this world. Our traditions taught us differently to first understand the purpose of significant occurrences and live within its confinements. Today our "old ways" are thrown aside while we gullible embrace education and the main stream philosophy,like children. We are also responsible for the demise of mankind and the negative affects of progress.
37609778Wednesday, Feb 10 at 3:18 PM Wow-ed wrote ...
Currently there are tribes trying to get this point across when they want to reclaim land, or disallow contamination of lands by businesses and corporations. The tribes are saying that contamination can interfere with our overall well-being. It is not about tree hugging here, but there must be a catalyst to increase environmental respect
37377841Monday, Feb 8 at 11:26 AM Concerned wrote ...
In Florida's Lake Okeechobee, male toads have become more like females. Many have ovaries as well as testes and have the mottled skin of a female and depleted testosterone; The big suspect was atrazine. In a 2003 published data, it showed frogs exposed in the laboratory to the agriculture herbicide atrazine became hermaphroditic. What makes atrazine particularly bad is that it is everywhere. It is the one pesticide that's always there, that's persistent. If atrazine feminizes animals by activating an enzyme that causes an imbalance between testosterone and estrogen, can't it also screw up the physiology of humans? I think it's a no-brainer.
37210082Add a comment
Most Popular