12.0: Saga of the unshaven armpit – skins and feminists
By
Gyasi Ross
|
![]() |
|
Photo courtesy Justin Finkbonner/We Emerge Photography Gyasi Ross |
Another trend at every school was that each school had some Short-Haired White Women Professors whose hair looked like Zac Efron or Demi Moore from “Ghost.” For some reason these Short-Haired White Professors always pulled me aside to talk about my Skin heritage and my people’s “matrilineality.” And although I wasn’t sure what “matrilinealality” meant, whatever it was, they made it sound dirty! I felt as if they were getting some strange perverse enjoyment at my expense. Shudder!
I have to admit, however, that their perversity was educational. Nothing like mine.
See, I found out that the mother/woman historically controlled many Skin groups’ respective clans/societies/bands. That control apparently caused strange excitement for many Short-Haired White Professors. Moreover, these Short-Haired White Professors saw that many Skin women take many leadership positions within Skin society. Plus, it just seemed like many Skin women were the heads of households.
The Short-Haired White Professors put these facts together and came up with a very strange conclusion: Skin women are the poster children for the western white feminist movement (what Rush Limbaugh refers to as “feminazis”). The Short-Haired White Professors taught this theory in social anthropology classes that I was silly enough to take.
I wasn’t convinced.
Still, I had to assume that what they said was correct, right? I mean, these women are very smart. Plus, I’m no feminist or woman. Still, even with my lack of proof, estrogen or breasts, I suspected that my Short-Haired White Professors were off a little bit. But how could I refute their theories? I mean, my family actually seemed to verify what they taught – in my house, my mom and sisters were the bosses. And it did seem like the women were always the bosses in my friends’ and relatives’ houses as well. My sisters beat me up if I didn’t listen.
My sisters = feminazis? Hmmm. …
I suspect that my Short-Haired White Professors wanted me to confirm their theory that women were the bosses in the modern Skin family. They wanted to find the link between everyday Skin life and their political theories. And I’m sure that 99 percent of the students in their classes paid more attention than me in class and were better qualified to answer their questions.
But instead of the kids who actually studied their feminist fare, they always wanted to talk to me – one of the few visibly Skin students who was weird enough to take their anthropology classes. Times were rough and the Short-Haired White Professors said “free lunch,” so of course I gladly agreed – to lunch, not their theory.
At lunch, one Short-Haired White Professor asked me, “Did your family matriarch set an example of strong oral communication?” I wondered, while chewing my free lunch, if they confused “matrilineal” with “matriarchal.” But the food was good and I didn’t want to talk too much, so I just kept it pretty short and honest.
Me: >chew, chew< “Well, mom yells a lot. But that’s just because we didn’t listen. Plus, she’s kinda hard of hearing.”
Short-Haired White Professor 1: >Smiling smugly< “Did you listen to the women figures in your life? And was your upbringing more woman-friendly?”
Me: >realizing that this vegetarian food isn’t half-bad< “Woman-friendly? What’s that? Er, well, mom and my sisters told me what to do. And I listened. I don’t know if that’s what you mean, but yeah. … that happened.” >chew, chew< My sisters could fight – much better than me. And my mom spanked us. So >chew<, I listened >burp<.”
SHWP: >squealing with joy< “Women were the unquestioned leaders in your society then? You simply accepted their authority?”
Me: >wiping crumbs from my face< “My society? Huh? Maybe? I’m really not sure who else could be leaders. There were no men around.”
SHWP: >looking disappointed< “Oh.”
Years later, I had a moment of clarity about the conversation with my Short-Haired White Professors. It happened while I watched the movie “My Big Fat Greek Wedding.” There was a quote: “The man is the head, but the woman is the neck. And she can turn the head any way she wants.”
Repeat:
“The man is the head, but the woman is the neck. And she can turn the head any way she wants.”
Wow. That quote articulated, in a way that I could not, my disagreement with the Short-Haired White Professor’s theory.
I mean, yeah, the women were the bosses in my family. But being the “boss” was a little different in our house. The bosses scrubbed the floors, did the dishes and took care of us. The bosses served us and other people who came to the house. The bosses raised me – the man – to be the head of the house. And hopefully when I took my place as the head of the house, I would remember the teachings, instruction and compassion that the women of the house – the neck – gave me. Hopefully I would bring some womanly wisdom to my natural “alpha male” leadership style.
To my mom and sisters, being the boss did not mean that you ran amuck and dominated others. It meant that you had more responsibility to raise other “bosses.” It meant that they worked to raise strong and responsible Skin men to make sure that the next generation of Skin women wouldn’t have to be the boss all by themselves. My guess is that my sisters and mom would’ve loved to have had a man in the house to help lessen their immense responsibility. But men weren’t around. So my mom and sisters raised me to be the loud and vocal man. They grew comfortable being the neck that guided me – the head.
Looking back, I think that my Short-Haired White Professors – and white women in general – are simply “looking” for something. Since they have historically been so oppressed, they crave an example of strong womanly leadership. Like many Skin women. These professorial white women presumably love the idea of powerful women in a “man’s world.” So they attached a fantasy image of Skin women and societies – that may have been accurate at one time – to current day Skins.
Simply put, the Short-Haired White Professors think that Skins’ gender relations are somehow better than napikwons’ and napiakis’ simply because Skin women have a history of being influential in Skin society.
Sadly, that’s not the case. Not even close. My Short-Haired White Professors paid attention to the theory and history, instead of the everyday reality of Skin women. I’ve watched many Skin women become leaders by default, not because they wanted to be. Skin women’s leadership positions are not because Skin men recognize Skin women as a source of authority. If Skin men really recognized women as the unquestioned leaders at home, there probably wouldn’t be the ridiculously high percentage of domestic violence against Skin women, for example. But there is. And it shows that Skin men have had serious issues with treating Skin women respectfully for a long time.
In fact, one could argue that Skin women are successful despite Skin men, not because of us. Therefore, my Short-Haired White Professor’s theory that Skin society was more “woman friendly” was pretty much bullpucky.
Having said that, thank God that there are women leaders! There are Skin women who climb to positions of power and elected office. From what I’ve seen, those women were oftentimes simply better at their jobs than the men that they beat to get into those positions, tougher than those men. They had to be, because men – Skins included – don’t give them an inch.
My suspicion is that Skin men didn’t just roll over and give the women leadership positions in the old days either. Those women were probably tough as nails – like my sisters – and Skin men had no choice but to listen to them. My guess is that the women had to fight and claw and battle to get and stay in those positions of influence.
What do you Skins think? E-mail me at gyasi.ross@gmail.com.
Gyasi “Fancy Skin” Ross is a member of the Amskapipikuni (Blackfeet Nation) and his family also comes from the Suquamish Tribe. His Pikuni (Blackfoot) name is “Oonikoomsika.” He is co-founder of Native Speaks LLC, a progressive company owned by young Native professionals which provides consultation and instruction for professionals and companies. Gyasi is currently booking dates for his newest presentation, “Mother Lovers: Poetic (and Musical) Justice.” E-mail him at gyasi.ross@gmail.com.
Recent Posts
- 26.0: Exit interview
- 25.0-Resolution: Fear of loved ones flying away
- 24.0 Lessons from the outhouse
- 23.0 Fruit of my loins: Eggs, optimism and fatherhood
- 22.0: Revered and respected elder, or dusty old codger?
- 21.0: Storytime: Wilma
- 20.0: Storytime
- 19.0: Resolution: Fear of flying
- 18.0: Resolution: Stuck
- 17.0 'Family Reunions'

Friday, Jan 15 at 2:28 AM lara lin wrote ...
MSuen ~ Are you McQueen Suen from Arizona?
35602977Tuesday, Jan 5 at 5:56 PM SoulMate wrote ...
Yr so funny!No! not the Demi Ghost hair cut LOL!! I love how you so frankly say what needs to be said and also keep the twist of humor and lightness that we all need.Even the men that stick around have trouble with their woman's power. And the women looking for power are looking for love/or something to love- for a woman's power is rooted in what/who she loves powerless=loveless Perhaps white women were possessed instead of loved,nr therefore lookin 4 what money cdnt buy or take 4rm Skin women
34941614Monday, Oct 19 at 4:23 PM jackson family wrote ...
I confer on this note, not all men are what they seem, what goes on behind closed doors, HAHA !! Men can be controlling, un-called for jealousy, beatings that can go on and on and on, and it is the women that do hold the families together, she is the rock of the family, we deal with day to day struggles, all the sicknesses thrown our way, even if we are sick it is our duty to get everybody else well regardless if we are sick ourselves. I think , a mom on this earth was meant to be the sole power
30807787Tuesday, Sep 1 at 3:28 PM Raphael wrote ...
I suspect lots of White women who were adopted into a pre-colonial Native society preferred it there. She probably discovered she commanded greater respect in a Native society than in her own. My guess also is that she had to work harder for that respect. I know I sometimes smirk at the Anglo-feminists who mistake matrilineal for matriarchal too. Some of our unshaven, patchoulli wearing, birkenstock admirers do the best they can. Tolerate them when possible. Tell them shut up when necessary.
28588529Monday, Aug 31 at 5:38 PM Single mom wrote ...
I love your article, kind of explains my situation. I'm a single mom of 3 children - 2 boys and a girl. I do my best as neck and the head of our household. I pray that my 2 sons grow up to be real men and be the Heads of their home one day and my daughter is one tough girl!
28543229Monday, Aug 31 at 4:01 PM Never thought of myself as a FEMINIST wrote ...
I was raised on the rez by some assertive women. To not know tribal specific "things" was a bad reflection on your family. If you know the history of "Rule of Thumb", we Native American women had way more rights than the white women ever used to. They had to fight for the right to vote and were considered property of the husband,they had no voice. Their objective in life was to marry well.The thumb rule was British, it meant the husband could beat the wife with a switch no bigger than his thumb.
28537374Monday, Aug 31 at 12:53 PM betsy wrote ...
OK, this white woman anthropologist with short hair thought this article was just hilarious. I promise I have never done this to a student, but I can just imagine someone doing it. It also says a lot about anthropologists - not really understanding other cultures even though they're supposedly the "experts," and actually romanticizing and stereotyping people. Next time I teach a class I think I'll pass out this article! Thanks.
28526179Monday, Aug 31 at 11:50 AM Laura wrote ...
You are RIGHT ON Gyasi. Great article; so true.
28522397Sunday, Aug 30 at 5:44 PM Hi wrote ...
gyasi, trust me when i say, even feminists don't have 'specific knowledge' of feminism... there needs to be more men in gender studies though, maybe you missed that? thanks for the chuckles :)
28489547Saturday, Aug 29 at 5:48 PM Gyasi wrote ...
Thank you all for the comments. I certainly do not claim to be an expert on feminism/feminists. This was a fun write--very difficult for me, because I do NOT have specific knowledge of feminism. Instead, I just always had a suspicion that they were oversimplifying (like most people do) the role of women in our societies. It seemed pleasurable to them--simultaneously put Native women on an artificial pedestal and emasculate Native men. I think the "truth" is much more nuanced and subtle.
28448832Saturday, Aug 29 at 1:09 PM Cracked up... wrote ...
as another Skin who had a mom as neck and head, nice, funny, and insightful piece. Keep writing and making me laugh. Was it respect for matrinlineal society or matriarchal to whoop my tail with my older brother's size 15 Chuck Taylors? Real life and academia are two different places, especially for Skins.
28440233Saturday, Aug 29 at 2:32 AM Gloria wrote ...
I do not agree that white women have generally been oppressed in society, they have had more rights througout history than any Native woman ever had, perhaps ever will (as women). According to your article, the level of oppression within Native society against women begins with them since as the neck they raise the oppressors oppressing them, or the head. The role of mariarch is alive and well, as much as the role of feminists, as much as patriarchy which is the common battle for both women.
28426476Friday, Aug 28 at 6:22 PM Mi'Kmaq wrote ...
Having been involved with Powwows and Spiritual Gatherings for many years, the strong message that I've heard from the Elders, both male and female, is to remind is of our responsibilities for seven generations yet to come.
28411037Friday, Aug 28 at 4:32 PM Aski Simos (Earthdancer) wrote ...
Gyasi: thought provoking dialogue. my mom left my (white)dad when I was 1 year old and she took her 9 children with her to raise by herself. she taught me how to cook, sew and care for myself. all of her children today are self-suffient. NDN women are the strength of our nations and I like how you said, they are responsible for raising the leaders of the future. Lets get back to the old days when men held power because they first proved their leadership.
28406481Thursday, Aug 27 at 10:26 PM Brandon wrote ...
Some do not understand equality means just that equality... not one dominates the other. I think you're right about the trying to fill something. I mean I had a German Father and a Mvskoke (Creek) Mother, you figure it out :).
28370781Thursday, Aug 27 at 9:50 PM rachel wrote ...
The women in my family have always been the ones who shoulder the responsability not because they choose to but because someone has to. Since colonization the western society value system has dominated our families. This system puts mens needs ahead of women and children. It allows men to abandon their responsabilty to those families.There are no consequencesto the men. That is why the women must be the leader in the home. It is by default.
28369472Thursday, Aug 27 at 3:05 PM To Leslie wrote ...
Alright Steve Harvey, real funny. If a man is not responsible and mature to have a family then he shouldn't.Physical abuse seems to be an issue here, beating another human being into submission is totally uncool!!
28352036Thursday, Aug 27 at 1:35 PM Leslie Scales wrote ...
Another way of putting it: "If mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy." But where is the discussion of shaved armpits? That was a bait-and-switch!
28346908Thursday, Aug 27 at 11:40 AM Swan wrote ...
Unfortunately some tribes have 70% of the fathers absent from the home. One source to validate this is the US Census bureau. That means that 3 of 10 fathers are in the home and Mom is single. I am a single mother I take my son fishing, hiking, target practice, I teach him to cook, study,etc. All of this I have done with my children so they could be self sufficient and not dependent on another person who might be needy. Not all NDN men have honor.
28339947Wednesday, Aug 26 at 6:01 PM Swan wrote ...
What happened to mine too?
28307402Wednesday, Aug 26 at 3:03 PM Willie Vee wrote ...
Hey, what happened to my comment ?
28298132Wednesday, Aug 26 at 10:13 AM BRDDANCER wrote ...
AS FAR AS MY TRIBE GOES WOMEN HAVE ALWAYS HELD A PLACE OF EQUALITY. WE JUST CARRY ON DIFFERENT ROLES AT TIMES. IT WAS NOT BECAUSE A LACK OF MEN DID WOMEN RISE TO LEADERSHIP ROLES IN MY TRIBE. I AM CAHUILLA. AND A CAHUILLA WOMEN DOES NOT STAY WITH A MAN WHO BEATS HER. AND MANY OF US HAVE HUSBAND WHO ARE SUPPORTIVE AND YES ALOT OF CAHUILLA WOMEN MARRY INTO OTHER TRIBES LOCALLY. THE INDIAN MAN IS A POSITIVE ROLE MODEL IN MY TRIBE. I AM SURE SOME MEN DO NOT LIVE UP TO TITLE , BUT 95 PERCENT DO.
28281042Tuesday, Aug 25 at 9:51 PM NM Native wrote ...
A wonderful piece, especially in light of recent happenings between my strong Native mother who raised my five sisters and myself. Along with my wonderful articulate Native father who both have been married for almost fifty years now. Much respect to all women, especially Native woman, the most beautiful beings on this earth.
28259288Tuesday, Aug 25 at 5:18 PM Mary Margaret wrote ...
great peice...with much love & respect for women
28248673Tuesday, Aug 25 at 4:58 PM Drey wrote ...
A matriarchal society does not evolve, it is. Used to be that the male moved in with the females family and if he did not provide and behave he was sent away, period. The "skin" women owned the property. Infiltration of other cultures desintigrated this along with respect for women,domestic violence, fatherless children, etc.I really like your articles.Hilarious,painful,you're not afraid to "get your hands dirty"! As mother's we make decisions not to have abusive men in our family's lives.
28247663Tuesday, Aug 25 at 4:25 PM Alex wrote ...
LOL, great article, Gyasi!! I remember first meeting you at at least one of those Community College NASAs, maybe even two!! you were just as unstoppable then as you are today!!! keep being a role model, so proud, happy for you!!!!
28245827Tuesday, Aug 25 at 3:59 PM msuen122 wrote ...
the free lunch scene made me recall a few free lunch moments myself from a native woman's perspective. my miff with white feminism, especially dv advocates, is they cast aside the men. literally trash the men. it is not native thing to do. they never seem to understand nor accept that a man's role is just as important despite the dysfunction. now, the question is how to rectify the mass dysfunction and bring the native men back into their role of leadership among their people & families?
28244423Tuesday, Aug 25 at 2:43 PM Jennie wrote ...
We all have feminine and masculine qualities. One is more dominant than the other. We have to remember that feminism is a white construct. It was in response to female oppression in their society. Your sisters and your mom were not "feminist" but at times exerted their masculinity when they needed. Often times we get confused as women because the western cultures female roles and norms contradict our "indigenous" cultures female roles and norms.
28240397Tuesday, Aug 25 at 2:14 PM Water4fish wrote ...
My Indian Dad split when I was a toddler, and so I grew up with the German step dad and the Scottish mother.....still my step sisters beat me up...what the hell? But as I learned the way, went from one marriage to the other and have had Indian women turn my head on so many occasions, I've found that submitting to my fate of being dictated to by women is far more comforting than fighting it.(My neck gets less sore...also helps me enjoy those warrior spirit moments more freely.)
28239242Tuesday, Aug 25 at 2:14 PM newe22 wrote ...
great article! really hits home.
28239237Tuesday, Aug 25 at 2:04 PM Tracy wrote ...
I always wonder how these academics aren't embarrassed to be so nosy. I'm a white feminist, but for me it's about universal respect and changing things like the domestic violence and poverty I grew up with. While I certainly don't know what it's like to be Indian, I do know what it's like to be asked really dumb questions or have someone project their ignorance on me. One favorite: "No one would ever know you were poor just by looking at you!"
28238656Tuesday, Aug 25 at 2:01 PM MAE in AK wrote ...
Glad to see another male Indian has figured out reality as it relates to all great Indian women. Go forth male skin and do not forget your learning. LOL Quyana (thank you in Yupik), and may many young male skins learn what you have displayed here...
28238553Tuesday, Aug 25 at 1:34 PM Fatma wrote ...
I would say that some of the experiences mentioned here parallel those experiences of other non-Anglo Americans. I am glad to read such a candid piece. Thank you.
28237328Tuesday, Aug 25 at 1:05 PM Skuyawin wrote ...
This one is my favorite. It hits home. I am a single mother of 3 sons....well put. Thank you for your words :)
28235723Tuesday, Aug 25 at 12:57 PM Dar wrote ...
Excellent article, from at least one short-haired white former feminist. I disagree with a previous commenter who said the article was misogynist. I don't see it that way at all. I see you really annoyed by culturally appropriative, kind of pathetic white women. That's not misogyny. That's plain old well-deserved annoyance.
28235307Tuesday, Aug 25 at 12:36 PM She Shar De Mar wrote ...
Very nice Gyasi! I love this my favorite writing also. The insight is incredible, the men in my family need to read this, TODAY! Thank you:)
28234233Tuesday, Aug 25 at 12:15 PM k.baze wrote ...
I am using that quote for sure! i love picturing you listen to the SHWL as you ate your free lunch lol.....awesome topic though, made me feel proud.
28233133Tuesday, Aug 25 at 9:19 AM Reality Check wrote ...
Hilarious! Your simultaneous maternal reverance and misoginy is amazing. Of course, it's well deserved ;) Those "feminazis" in college really are a trip - I can only imagine the way they cooed over you " a real life child of the womb" Good stuff
28224691Tuesday, Aug 25 at 3:30 AM Rosie wrote ...
Good write, G! I have my own thoughts on matriarchs and feminism and its applicability in the Indigenous world, and it's a hotly debated issue amongst the female folk I come across. We'll have to discuss sometime. Lim limpt for your words. R.
28217933Tuesday, Aug 25 at 2:34 AM AIMee wrote ...
"There's no higher law than Grandma's Law in Indian Country." Right, Gyasi?
28217493Tuesday, Aug 25 at 1:41 AM Mestizaskin wrote ...
Well Mr. Ross.. I have to say this may be my favorite one yet. A lot of what you wrote rang true with me. I, too, am the neck (and head) of my household. Raising 2 strong young women myself. I, too, would like to have some help with the immense responsibility, but am glad in a way, to have been put in this position by default. I can now raise my warriorettes in strength and by example. They are seeing first hand that women can be gentle and strong at the same time. Thank you. ;)
28216888Tuesday, Aug 25 at 1:09 AM waboozeyes wrote ...
most excellent. the links are worth clicking on. lol. it must have been excruciating looking for them? great read :-)
28216428Add a comment
Most Popular