Tools

Newcomb: Something missing from PBS’s ‘Tecumseh’s Vision’

By Steven Newcomb

Tecumseh’s Vision” is the second chapter of a five-part documentary film series being aired on PBS every Monday from April 13 – May 11. The series is being shown on the program “The American Experience,” and the series title, “We Shall Remain,” is taken from a speech attributed to the great Shawnee leader Tecumseh who lived from 1768 – 1813. (My Shawnee grandmother pronounced his name Tecum-thé).

Directed by Ric Burns and Chris Eyre (Cheyenne/Arapaho), “Tecumseh’s Vision” is an effort to give the audience a sense of the magnitude of what Tecumseh and his brother Tenskwatawa (“the Prophet”) accomplished. It also provides an emotional portrayal of the devastation experienced by Indian nations and peoples in what is now called the Old Northwest (that became Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin).

From 1805 – 1813 Tecumseh made a Herculean effort to build a multi-national American Indian confederacy and to create an internationally recognized Indian buffer state between Canada and the United States. Covering thousands of miles on foot, horseback and canoe, he overcame many hurdles, including cultural and linguistic diversity, tremendous physical hardships, as well as opposition to his efforts. Through it all, he maintained an extraordinary degree of optimism and self-confidence.

Tecumseh had a charismatic personality and great athletic prowess. He was also a deep thinker and brilliant orator. One non-Indian translator who grew up with the Shawnees, and was fluent in their language since childhood, said he had tremendous difficulty translating Tecumseh’s speeches because many of the concepts Tecumseh used in the Shawnee language were so profound.

The history of Tecumseh’s life has been dealt with extensively over the past 196 years since his death Oct. 5, 1813, but, in my view, the makers of “Tecumseh’s Vision” missed an opportunity to provide a more accurate version of U.S. history by explaining the lives of Tecumseh and his brother in the context of the colonial system of the American empire.

A couple years ago, when a woman from the production staff at WGBH in Boston called me at an early point in the project, I told her, “If you really want to tell the story of Tecumseh and his brother, then you need to accurately explain what they were up against.”

There is a fascinating back story leading up to Tecumseh’s remarkable campaign to unify the Indian nations. It traces to the Freemason founding of the United States. Some sense of this story is revealed in the book “The Secret Founding of America: The Real Story of Freemasons, Puritans, & the Battle for the New World,” by Nicholas Hagger (1998). This is not some crackpot “conspiracy theory,” it is the lesser known history of Freemasonry which is at the heart of the founding of the United States. It involves a well-conceived, long-range plan to take over and profit from the sale of all Indian lands in the Northwest Territory. The efforts of Tecumseh and his brother, and their allies, represent a concerted effort to stop this from happening.

George Washington (a freemason) plays a prominent role in the history. He had his eye on the Ohio Valley lands from the time he was young. He was a surveyor and land speculator, and other members of his family were also land speculators (his brothers were members of the Ohio Company). He referred to the United States as “our infant empire.”

Washington was the first to propose the colonization of the Ohio Valley, and he once said, “If the scheme of establishing a new government on the Ohio, in the manner talked of, should ever be effected, these must be the most valuable lands in it.”

As historian Colin G. Calloway has explained, “The American revolutionaries who fought for freedom from the British Empire in the East also fought to create an empire of their own in the West.”

John Marshall (a freemason) became chief justice of the United States. His father, Thomas, a friend of Washington’s, was also a surveyor and land speculator who moved west into the region that became Kentucky. Marshall referred to the United States as “this, our wide-spreading empire.”

Historian George Bancroft called the 1787 Northwest Ordinance “the colonial system of the United States,” or, in other words, the colonial system of the American empire. According to its founding document, the Masonic Society of the Cincinnati was formed to promote “the future dignity of the AMERICAN EMPIRE.” Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa were working to oppose what amounted to a massive juggernaut of well-planned imperialistic expansion.

Rufus Putnam (a freemason) was one of Washington’s brigadier generals, and a chief engineer for the Continental Army. In a letter to the president of the Continental Congress dated June 1783, Putnam said of the Ohio Valley: “I am, sir, among those who consider the [British] cession of so great a tract of territory to the United States in the western world as a very happy circumstance and of great consequence to the American Empire.”

Putnam had a plan to overcome Indian opposition: “…let a chain of forts be established,” he said. The forts “should be built on the bank of the river, if the ground will admit, and about twenty miles distant from each other.” Once such a chain of forts was established, Putnam wrote, “who ever will inspect the maps must be convinced that all the Indians living on the waters of the Mohawk, Oswego, Susquehanna, and Alleghany Rivers, and all the country south of Lakes Ontario and Erie, will be encircled in such a manner as will effectually secure their allegiance and keep them quiet, or oblige them to quit their country.” This is the first hint at what became the U.S. policy of Indian Removal.

Tecumseh’s life can be understood as a major aspect of the Indian opposition to the imperial expansion of the United States. It can also be understood in the context of the most influential whites of that era using Indian lands for massive land speculation and profit making in the Ohio country, while using the sale of Indian lands to pay off the public debt incurred by the United States during the Revolutionary War. Unfortunately, the PBS production failed to tell this part of the story.

Steve Newcomb, Shawnee/Lenape, is indigenous law research coordinator in the education department of the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, co-founder and co-director of the Indigenous Law Institute, and author of “Pagans in the Promised Land: Decoding the Doctrine of Christian Discovery” (Fulcrum, 2008).

Thursday, Jun 18 at 8:00 AM calligraphy1019 wrote ...

Isn't it well known by now that those who win the wars are the ones who get to write the history, right or wrong though it may be? Why can't we tell the truth about why it was done, whoever it was that did it? Because it would undermine the "decent" society that the u.s. has become? (sarcasm) So it's ok for Christians to break every commandment if they do so for their God? Enough said?

24034692
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, May 15 at 10:18 PM Jay Taber wrote ...

Newsom's criticism seems unduly harsh. Perhaps his justified resentment against exclusion of the indigenous perspective in mainstream media has clouded his judgment. This series is not the final word, but only a beginning.

21584934
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, May 15 at 12:50 PM Mary L. wrote ...

As an non-ndn who grew up in the 70's I was thrilled with this entire series. I feel like after the casinos were built history was again forgotten. I want my son age 14 to have the appreciation for ndn history and struggle that I have. This series helped to remind me of that and teach him those lessons. It's only a small step and there needs to be a lot more of the truth in the education system. But I hope this series starts a trend.

21561454
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, May 14 at 4:51 PM len marek wrote ...

a tale oft told and as facts are brought out, certain people react in shame and shout "revisionists" Where are the new ndn warriors? claim our past and renew our ndn future. use the tools used against you ndn natives!

21519667
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, May 14 at 2:06 PM Dale Hegstrom wrote ...

Perhaps the best thing that needs to come out of the PBS series, "[Here]We Shall Remain" is a reexamination of the texts used to teach American history in our public schools. There is not only a void in teaching us about the origins of this nation, but a decidedly European perspective that robs us all of a glorious and enriching look at the past of the western hemisphere.

21500624
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, May 14 at 10:59 AM Ron Goebel wrote ...

To single out the "Freemasons" as people who coveted the land occupie by the American Indians, is a perpetuation of hate mongering,ignorance, and falsehoods. The truth is, every man, woman, and child who ever arrived on our shores wanted a piece of this land, and were prepared to do what ever it took to get. this is human nature. What about Joseph Brant, the war chief of the Iroquois. He was also a freemason, so was Eli Parker,a Seneca, who was Gen. Grant's sec. Masonic Principles founded the US

21428982
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, May 14 at 9:29 AM two knives wrote ...

I agree, something was missing from Tecumseh's Vision. In the book, Red Man's Drama In the New World, Jenning Wise, 1932, he has an interesting perspective of history that is not allowed in our history books. His take on the American Revolution was that it was the French-Indian War part II. The war had little to do about taxes and everthing to do about capturing the Ohio Valley. Tecumseh was the only barrier to that end and with his death, the eventual death of a real Indian Country also ended.

21422359
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, May 13 at 5:45 PM Marianne Coats wrote ...

It is clear from some of the above comments as well as from our current dilemma over the prior administrations torture program that many "Americans" simply refuse to admit that we murdered our way into dominance of this continent under the disinfected term of "manifest destiny". God help the People of this land.

21392602
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, May 13 at 11:54 AM Gina wrote ...

I agree that the Tecumseh segment lacked something. For me, it wasn't politics but Tecumseh, the man, and the smaller incidents that defined his decency and deep moral values, his magnetic and dynamic personality, his ability to stand out in whatever situation he was placed in. In the late 1990s, Life Magazine (I believe) listed historians' top 50 American heroes. Tecumseh was #5 after Lincoln, FDR, his wife, and ML King. Sadly, the Tecumseh segment failed to portray the greatness of the man.

21369802
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, May 13 at 11:26 AM Ed King wrote ...

The Haggar book is nothing more than fantasy. Perhaps Mr. Newcomb would also care to address Haggar's virulent anti-Semitism? Trying to make Freemasonry a fall-guy for somebody's agenda is an old chestnut and using works of Freemasonry's enemies is typical. (Bernard Fay's work on Franklin fit in nicely with his Nazi agenda back in the 1940s for example.) Many Freemasons did much to advance the Indian cause and the author should be ashamed of this attempt to denigrate them. www.masonicinfo.com

21367754
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, May 13 at 10:06 AM spaceman wrote ...

i think the shawnee man said everything that is true today, and thats unity among indians at every conceivable level. i was told of this shawnee man as a kid that he passed away on his way into mexico to ask for help to unite. is there such an indian person today with us now?

21361899
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, May 13 at 2:34 AM thentherewere4 wrote ...

America - Home of the Free.In America there is Freedom of Infomation for all it's citizens. Strange indeed that this book, after 200 years seeks to reveal that the founding of the Home of the Free was somehow compromised. That the integrity concerning one of it's founding fathers (or two) was and remains questionnable in it's focus and aim is beyond doubt. That after 200 years the American people should now become aware of the real scheme behind their high minded principles demonstrates a seriou

21347357
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, May 12 at 4:09 PM E Savilla aka Storm Cloud wrote ...

Steve Newcomb's book should be required reading for every Native American high school and college. The story should be told at public gatherings. It's not enough for non-Indian Americans to go on believing "we won the war and took Indian land fair and square." If they know the truth it may change some attitudes. Kudos to Newcomb.

21326699
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand