Story Published:
Feb 14, 2010
Story Updated:
Feb 12, 2010
TARPON SPRINGS, Fla. – A Unitarian Universalist congregation in Florida has issued a Statement of Conscience repudiating the Christian Doctrine of Discovery and urging the United States government to adopt the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The Unitarian Universalist Church of Tarpon Springs is the oldest Unitarian congregation in the state and the Statement of Conscience is the first it has issued in its 125 years of existence.
“It’s a really big deal in our faith,” said Dan Callaghan, the man who initiated the action in his church.
The Tarpon congregation is the third religious group in the U.S. in less than a year to disavow the Christian Doctrine of Discovery and support the adoption of the Declaration.
The Episcopal Church blazed the path when it passed a resolution called “Repudiate the Doctrine of Discovery” during and urged support of the Declaration at its national meeting last July.
Two months later, the Indian Committee of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends issued a Minute – analogous to a resolution – disavowing the Doctrine and urging adoption of the Declaration.
The Doctrine of Discovery was a principle of international law developed in a series of 15th century papal bulls and 16th century charters by European monarchs. A racist philosophy, the Doctrine gave white Christian Europeans the right to claim the lands and resources of non-Christian peoples and kill or enslave them – if other Christian Europeans had not already done so.
Implemented during the so-called Age of Discovery or Age of Exploration that opened trade routes to Africa, America and Asia, the Doctrine was a prototype trade agreement between the superpowers of the day – Portugal and Spain, followed by France, England and the Netherlands – that laid out the rules of competition between the developing nation states in their ever-growing hunger for colonies, resources and markets.
The Doctrine sanctioned the genocide of indigenous peoples in the “New World.”
And it is embedded in U.S. law through Congress’ assumption of plenary power over Indian nations and via the 19th century U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Johnson v. M’Intosh, which was cited by the high court as recently as 2005 to deny a land claim by the Oneida Indian Nation.
Just as the resolution by the national Episcopal Church began with one person – John Dieffenbacher-Krall in Maine – Callaghan intends to gather support for the Unitarian Universalist’s General Assembly – its national organization – to adopt his congregation’s Statement of Conscience.
“It will take in this case at least three years of study at numerous levels and the issue will be debated and this Statement of Conscience will be in a kind of content with other really crucial issues – in the past they’ve been climate change and homelessness – and, essentially, we’ll have to make an argument that this will in fact become a pillar of our faith. And if it is accepted after two general assemblies at that point we’ll put all of our personnel and all of our funds behind making sure that our Statement of Conscience comes to fruition,” Callaghan said.
Unitarian Universalism is a unique faith that is rooted in the Judeo-Christian tradition, but does not adhere to any creed or dogma. It is a liberal religion that embraces theological diversity and welcomes different beliefs, according to its Web site.
The church actively involves itself in issues of social justice.
Callaghan learned about the Doctrine of Discovery from his long time friend Joseph Heath, the Onondaga Nation’s general counsel.
“I sent Joe an e-mail last September and asked if there was anything in particular that our church could do for the Onondaga and his response was, ‘Why don’t you do what the Episcopal Church did? They passed a resolution repudiating the Doctrine of Discovery.’ My first response was, ‘What?’ I had no idea what he was talking about,” Callaghan said.
That was the general reaction, but people changed when they learned the truth about the Doctrine and its continuing impact today, Callaghan said.
“I think at first it was astonishment that something so egregious could be part of our justice system, and then I think it was really anger that something like this could persist so long, and as we looked at the issue, we came to realize that in a real sense we’ve managed to camouflage this under the idea of Manifest Destiny.”
Manifest Destiny was the 19th century term for the belief that the U.S. was destined or ordained by God to expand its territories from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It was an extension of the Puritan settler colonists’ belief that they were “chosen people” destined for “the promised land.”
After studying materials that Heath sent him and researching the Doctrine further, Callaghan made an impassioned presentation to his congregation for support, and on Jan. 24, the Unitarian Universalist Church of Tarpon Springs issued its Statement of Conscience to “repudiate this Doctrine of Christian Discovery, urging its removal from any standing in U.S. law, and urge the United States to adopt and implement the U.N. Declaration of Indigenous Rights.”
Callaghan has already gained support for the statement from dozens of Unitarian congregations in Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and the church’s representative at the United Nations.
Steven Newcomb, Shawnee/Lenape scholar, researcher and columnist for Indian Country Today, who inspired the movement to repudiate the Doctrine of Discovery through his many essays and 2008 book “Pagans in the Promised Land,” said it is “absolutely necessary” for churches to lead the way.
“Until there’s a groundswell of support and momentum to address the issue and come to terms with the way in which the Christian Doctrine has been used against indigenous nations of people throughout the world, I don’t believe it will really be taken seriously by people in positions of influence and authority and power within governments in the way it needs to be taken seriously,” Newcomb said.
You have indicated this comment should be removed.
The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .
anonymous said on Thursday, Feb 18 at 9:45 AM
Gale, you're absolutely right. I agree with everything you said in your last comment. Thank you for your clarification.
37809891Gale Courey Toensing said on Wednesday, Feb 17 at 8:09 PM
To anonymous: Thank you for your observation. I sit corrected. I should have said that Palestine has been SETTLED since time immemorial -- continuously for tens of thousands of years. Obviously, Palestinian Christians have worshipped in the Holy Land only since the beginning of Christianity 2000 years ago. The point I meant to emphasize, though, is that not all Christians are responsible for the Christian Doctrine of Discovery.
37782949anonymous said on Wednesday, Feb 17 at 2:53 PM
I think that's a stretch. Gale saying, Christians lived in the Holy Land since time immemorial. I'm sorry, the Neopagan faiths come before them, as did Europe’s Anglo-Saxon paganism. But I'm really glad for the Unitarian Universalist congregation who has issued a Statement of Conscience repudiating the Christian Doctrine of Discovery.
37761611Gale Courey Toensing said on Wednesday, Feb 17 at 12:05 PM
To "anonymous": Just a reminder not to paint all of Christianity with the same oppressive brush. There are Christians living in the Holy Land today who have lived there since time immemorial and whose ancestors had nothing to do with the Christian Doctrine of Discovery, conquest of indigenous peoples, dispossession of indigenous peoples' land, genocide, ethnic cleansing or oppression of non-Christians. These Christians live in Palestine and practice their religion and worship at the sacred sites of Christianity as their ancestors have done for the last 2000 years. Euro-American Christianity is distinctly and peculiarly disconnected from the Holy Land where Christians are prevented from visiting some of their sacred sites by the Israeli government, which has expropriated them and turned them into tourist attractions where menorah and depictions of the Last Support on black velvet are sold.
37748111Timing is everything said on Wednesday, Feb 17 at 3:55 AM
In 1879 a judge ruled that "an Indian is a person." WOW. Who'd a thunk it? 16 yrs. prior, Abe L. signed the Emancipation Proc., one day after hanging an assortment of innocent "Indians" for the "great Sioux uprising." The bounty was subsequently lifted on NA's and Charles Curtis was V.P. Go figure. Gotta love the religion that runs the country. Not to mention the so called separation of church and state.
37730711Newcomb said on Wednesday, Feb 17 at 3:16 AM
To Estavan: The past is present. Just as we are all a product of our own past, so too, the present is a product of concepts that originated in the past.
37730181Estaven said on Wednesday, Feb 17 at 12:38 AM
Great timing. The Age of Discovery and the Doctrine of Discovery are only over two hundred years old. So just how brave are the Unis being here? Stupid.
37726244Native said on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 3:45 PM
The "Doctrine of Discovery" is the illegitimate foundation of U.S. Federal Indian law and policy and served as the basis for the Court’s characterization of tribes as 'domestic dependent nations'. The premise of "domestic dependent nationhood" begins with Chief Justice John Marshall's statement in the Johnson v. M'Intosh ruling that Indian "rights to complete sovereignty, as independent nations, were necessarily diminished by the … principle that discovery gave title to those who made" the discovery.
37698079iaintbacchus said on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 1:20 PM
Not to put down a right action, but what, exactly, does repudiation of the doctrine of discovery mean? There isn't anything left to "discover" and all of the indigineous peoples in North America and Asia have already been dispossessed and exploited. Does this mean we're repudiating the doctrine as it applies the the very few first peoples left in, for instance, Brazil? I know nobody is proposing that we give North America back to the first peoples.
37688164Taigitsune said on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 8:10 AM
skeptic: Have you checked out the UUSC lately? We have an excellent track record of providing aid, not only as individual congregations, but worldwide: http://www.uusc.org/
37670119skeptic said on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 3:09 AM
Perhaps it would help the Unitarian apologetic image if they quit apologizing and helped out with heat aid, medical supplies, etc. Any one can "be sorry", but I would ask for proof. Not just words. Words are worthless, until backed by actions.
37665744NotSoCrazyHorse said on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 1:30 AM
Chato: Regarding my comments regarding this church and communism. Check out their national website where they list the various programs for social justice, community organizing, etc... No name calling here, just facts. http://www.uua.org/socialjustice/index.shtml
37663534anonymous said on Monday, Feb 15 at 6:21 PM
Christianity was a movement that began when someone was crucified and tortured to death by ruthless oppressors. This movement emerged after one century of slave revolts in the Roman Empire. The oppressors decided to co-opt the movement and destroy it from within, so successful they adopted it as the official religion of the state. This is the explanation of the historical Jesus and the Christian religion. It became the theology for centuries afterwards. It is typical of oppressors and systems of fascism, total 'orthodoxy' in thought and speech is demanded, as oppressors once again use the crucifix as instrument of terror with which to threaten the people with the most extreme forms of torture and genocide if they commit 'heresy' and refuse obedience to the religious and state authorities.
37645626Bev said on Monday, Feb 15 at 10:27 AM
Most Christian churches in the US have never considered this "doctrine" to be anything to discuss. There was NOTHING even remotely Christian about it. Just some crazy powerhappy Zealots from the 15th century. The horrific things the Native Americans were put thru because of it, was no less disturbing than the "doctrine of Hitler" was in Germany and the concentration camps. Speaking as a Christian who knows the true meaning of Christianity, I am appalled that this ever happened and am praying that everyone will wake up & denounce this "doctrine of evil" for what it is. Bless and be Blessed.
37616778Wise One said on Monday, Feb 15 at 4:27 AM
Well lets see, several churches have agreed to repudiate Doctrine of Discovery, how many thousands more to go? Historically religious institutions become involved when government fails to act timely. In this case, tribal governments find little priority in resolving this "conflict of belittlement", which must eventually convince US Congress to also repudiate the same. Suppose it did happen during my lifetime, then what? What would be the ultimate end-result, would we be more progressive, profitable - or accepted by the general populace? I don't anticipate this perfect world syndrome occurring soon, meanwhile forget your traditional culture and dive into the melting pot, for this is the seditious culprit eating our hearts and not the the overly played Doctrine of Discovery.
37609516skinwalker said on Sunday, Feb 14 at 11:08 PM
Be afraid christans the truth will sicken your offstring. However all of this ownership of tax, local or international does not print any more new value. But get one thing clear there is no united states of america or people gene titled meltingpot. All the views of christan orgy is getting lost name callers desperate. Assimaltion policy if forced indian policy but chistan fund raising is out of gaming practice. Bingo the chance of being a new view about bubble equity invention for god light is over done. I suppose the computer is the fastest bullet aimed at world bull dropping pile. Molestation of mass need to belong is never knowing being. We are infinite by all positive atom not forbidden fruit gossip. The greek church in tarpon spring must have run out of sponges. Shop supper walmart get more and fell richer christan excuse. Our language is rooted way beyond sound or print as wards of the government or crown an indian treaty is blue print tribes all over the world know it
37603921Kinew said on Sunday, Feb 14 at 7:01 PM
Keep repeating Steven Newcomb Shawnee/Lenape, Steven Newcomb Shawnee/lenape, Steven Newcomb Shawnee/Lenape No documentation, no enrollment, no tribal membership no problem. Keep repeating Steven Newcomb Shawnee/Lenape oh right you and carol are correspondents for the same paper.
37597538skeptic said on Sunday, Feb 14 at 6:16 PM
Unitarians must not be "God fearers". Evidently they have morals. The US was voted out of the UNHRC in 2001. Any self respecting Neanderthal would have thrown out the Doctrine of Discovery long ago. How archaic. Thank you Steven Newcomb for the excellent book.
37596314mwlfqotn said on Sunday, Feb 14 at 4:55 PM
definition of communist comes from having a "common union"......need to be careful with namecalling so not to create a wider divide. If we treat others with respect, we will also reap the same respect. I am so weary of the divisiveness, though I accept that there is reason for distrust and anguish....BOTH "sides" need to extend a bit of forgiveness & understanding and not be faulting this generation for the sins of the past...let's look for what's going right and build on it...no?
37594061chato said on Sunday, Feb 14 at 3:47 PM
Notsocrazyhorse please clearify your communist comment interested in what you have say.
37591954Add a comment
Most Popular