Tools

Recognition issues may kill Indian Affairs panel

By Andy Sher, Chattanooga Times Free Press, Tenn.

NASHVILLE (MCT) – Nearly 180 years after President Andrew Jackson forcibly began uprooting American Indians from the Southeast, a Tennessee commission that deals with Native American issues may die amid a fight involving groups wanting state recognition.

The already troubled Tennessee Commission of Indian Affairs suffered a blow last month when the Tennessee General Assembly’s Joint Government Operations Subcommittee on Agriculture and Natural Resources failed to act on a motion extending the agency’s existence.

“I guess this is a good day to die,” Indian Affairs Commissioner Bill Wells told lawmakers during the hearing. He called the effort to kill the seven-member commission “another slap against the Native Americans of Tennessee.”

That doesn’t mean the commission is necessarily finished. Lawmakers on the full Government Operations Committees or the entire legislature could grant the panel, now scheduled to go out of existence June 30, 2010, a new lease on life. In fact, in 2007 lawmakers rejected committee recommendations and approved extending it to 2010.

At issue are efforts by Tennessee-based groups seeking official state recognition as American Indian tribes. Such recognition, some proponents say, would result in cultural and economic benefits, making groups potentially eligible for government grants. Others question some groups’ legitimacy as American Indian.

Tom Kunesh is an Indian Affairs commissioner from Chattanooga whose mother is a member of the federally recognized Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in the Dakotas.

“The bigger thing at stake is essentially who is considered Indian in the state and who is in control of the commission,” he said.

Kunesh said American Indians who don’t “buy” claims by some groups “are now called foreigners and non-indigenous. It’s kind of crazy.” He favors abolishing the panel if lawmakers do not give it more powers.

During the 2009 legislative session, Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey, R-Blountville, who is Senate speaker, and House Republican Leader Jason Mumpower of Bristol pushed legislation that would have resulted in official state recognition of the “Remnant Yuchi Nation” of Kingsport and other groups.

Kunesh described the Yuchi group, whose members live in Ramsey’s district, as “a fraudulent culture club.”

Ramsey said he delayed the bill so the issue could be considered more fully. But he charged the TCIA is “dominated by people whose ultimate goal is to keep Indian tribes from being recognized by the state of Tennessee.”

The lieutenant governor opposes renewing the TCIA. He said lawmakers can enact their own guidelines on what constitutes a qualified group, create a new panel and put it under the secretary of state’s office. An administrative law judge can settle disputes, he said.

“I don’t want anybody recognized who shouldn’t be legitimately recognized. There are times I wish I’d never seen this,” Ramsey said, noting he was simply trying to help constituents. “I was eaten up with e-mails from both sides. This is a very emotional issue.”

Senate Government Operations Committee Chairman Bo Watson, R-Hixson, called the TCIA “somewhat of a dysfunctional group,” noting a state entity “should not continue to exist if they’re not being efficient or effective.”

In documents submitted to the joint Government Operations Subcommittee last month, TCIA said it approved state guidelines for recognizing groups back in 2005. But the commission repealed them as they were about to take effect after being told by a then-chairman to do so, Kunesh said.

That came about after the group was criticized in a 2007 public hearing by the federally recognized Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma, which warned lawmakers about “pseudotribes” getting approved. At the same hearing, state-based groups attacked the TCIA standards as designed to keep them from being recognized.

Kunesh said the group is in the process of trying to re-establish the guidelines.

During last month’s hearing, two TCIA members called on lawmakers to let the commission expire. One of them was Indian Affairs Commissioner James E. Meeks, of Tracy City, who belongs to one of the groups seeking recognition – the Chikamaka Band of the Southern Cumberland Plateau. Meeks said the group has members in Marion, Sequatchie, Grundy, Warren, Coffee and Franklin counties.

Meeks said the Chikamaka Band is comprised of descendants of American Indians who hid in the mountains rather than face the 1830s Trail of Tears expulsions.

“It wasn’t until one of our council members passed that our council decided we would open up and let the world know,” said Meeks, who recalled that was about 15 to 20 years ago.

The state needs a Commission of Indian Affairs “but not this one,” he said. He charged the current panel is dominated by “non-Tennessee Indians” who have no business trying to run things.
Panel’s purpose

• Deal fairly and effectively with Indian affairs.

• Research and find local, state and federal resources of funding and other assistance for the implementation or continuation of meaningful programs for Indian citizens of Tennessee.

• Provide aid and protection for Indians as needs are demonstrated.

• Promote recognition of and the right of Indians to pursue cultural and religious traditions considered by them to be sacred and meaningful to Native Americans.

History: The TCIA was created in the early 1980s. State lawmakers allowed it to go out of existence in 2001 after squabbles with then-Gov. Don Sundquist over commission appointments and disputes over state Transportation Department treatment of historic Native American sites.

(c) 2009, Chicago Tribune. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Monday, Dec 14 at 11:05 PM skyhawk wrote ...

there are many indians and descendants of indians in the southeastern u.s. many of these people do have the truth of honest native blood in their veins, they should not be told that they don't matter and to shut up. let local indians govern local indians. keep the troublemakers out of our councils. our blood will never die out. support indigenous women for justice website remember anna mae aquash and perry ray robinson. aimmythbusters,noparolepeltier.amwericanindianmafia

33679811
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Dec 2 at 9:08 AM indian survival wrote ...

If the CNO wants to lead, rather than destroy State Recognized Tribes, the UKB, the Delaware, and the Freedmen; do this: [1] protect Cherokee sacred and historic sites [2] revitalize the Cherokee language in all Cherokee people [3] revitalize the cultural ceremonies on original Cherokee soil [4] protect Cherokee cultural property from fraud and abuse [5] return to the homeland from an exile in OK [6] reunify the all Cherokee people in one govt [7] help other fragmented INDN communities reunify

32957579
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Dec 2 at 8:30 AM Cherokee indian wrote ...

Let us not confuse actual history with the politics of Indian identity and money. The Cherokee Nation was dissolved by Congress in 1906, not returning until 1975. The Eastern Band were made citizens of North Carolina in 1817 and only survived as a community because of William Thomas, a white landowner. We cannot assume that there were and are no other Cherokee survivors. Chad Smith's approach is a quest for more money, not Cherokee identity.

32955754
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, Dec 1 at 10:01 PM Lazy Wolf wrote ...

What role does the National Indian Congress and the newly establish Native American Embassy have in dealing with this. Is a group of people alone in making this claim to be reconized by a foreign gov't. It should be that as long as the Natives recognize other tribes that should be all that is required for reconition as a tribe. Native America needs to take a serious look at our Soveriegn Status, we had civiliations and gov'ts when the whiteman destroyed these to get or steal our land.

32941499
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Nov 21 at 9:59 PM Tribal Recognition wrote ...

Citizenship Verses Heritage Cherokee People have struggled for centuries to survive and maintain their distinct identities as citizens of the Cherokee Nation. Today we face a dangerous assault on our tribal sovereignty from a proliferation of fraudulent groups attempting to claim the same treaty rights and obligations that rightfully belong to the true historic Indian nations. Everyone has the right to their family heritage. http://tribalrecognition.cherokee.org

32483151
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, Nov 19 at 7:02 AM NDNLady wrote ...

The old "my ancestors hid to avoid the trail" is the most shopworn and ludicrous cliche that Cherokees hear. According to our laws, separating from the Nation meant surrendering your Cherokee citizenship. Period. And to suggest that some random collection of self-identified "descendants" can just suddenly re-appear and now be entitled to status is nothing less than exploitation. Kudos to the Cherokee Nation for continuing to speak out and lobby against recognition for these frauds.

32340364
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Nov 18 at 9:40 PM de wrote ...

About time politicians had the courage to call "fraudulent pseudo tribes" as we see it. The similiarities are amazing in VT they seem to have all been hiding in the woods too, now NH will say the same thing. A descendant or grndma said does NOT make an Indian. A full Indian life of experiences with the rez, all the rez school issues, makes a real Indian an Indian, not someone who is the new agers who likes to sell stories, dress up and dance, reenactors who suddenly like all the attention. nuts

32329384
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Nov 18 at 3:59 PM Warrior Woman wrote ...

The federal law states that to be considered ETHNIC, you have to have 1/4 bloodline, which is why most tribes require that specific blood quantum. The grants and other factors that the tribes accept, and and do have requirements attached to them. The descendants of the people usually means that the blood no longer exists. They want the same "Perks" that us registered NDN's receive.

32313374
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Nov 18 at 3:16 PM ruben horseman wrote ...

when people really want to rattle about indian, i like to ask what would a indian be in their eyes. percents of blood, treaties, benfits, culture, recognition, these i see as nonindian or B.I.A. standards. what would be the indian want to have as a standard?

32310564
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Nov 18 at 12:30 PM meversusthem wrote ...

i think indians don't have a choice but to talk with other countries and try to get a foothold into the united nations. this to accomplish recognition of human rights issues, such as being made poor because of land being taken away. it leads to indians having to become energetic, assertive, and willing to talk over what will be said.

32299844
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand