Tools

Tribes may gain more river input

By The Associated Press

MITCHELL, S.D. (AP) – American Indian tribes could have more influence in management of the Missouri River after a bylaw change by the Missouri River Association of States and Tribes.

The change increased the number of tribal representatives on MoRAST’s board of directors from six to 13.

That puts the 28 tribes in the Missouri River Basin on a more equal footing with MoRAST’s seven member states, who also have 13 representatives on the board. Six states have two each, but Wyoming, which is not a “mainstem” river state, has only one.

Eleven tribes were represented at MoRAST’s most recent meeting in Rapid City. That contrasts with a MoRAST meeting one year ago in Pierre when no tribal representatives attended.

“That’s a big step forward, because our group has really wanted to live up to its name of representing both states and tribes in the basin,” said David Pope, MoRAST’s executive director in Topeka, Kan. “And we think we’re off and running in that regard now.”

Pope said the earlier lack of tribal involvement was indicative of a long-standing problem afflicting Missouri River organizations.

“Historically, there’s probably little doubt that the tribes have been underrepresented or not involved to the depth, at least, that probably would be appropriate for their status in the basin and the significant role that they play,” he said. “I think our group is the primary one that’s really fully embraced their involvement.”

Another change by MoRAST allows tribal representatives to be reimbursed up to $500 for travel to MoRAST’s meetings, which are held throughout the river basin.

MoRAST was formed in 2006. In addition to its tribal members, MoRAST has members from the governments of North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Nebraska, Iowa and Kansas, and also has associations with federal agencies.

Lately, MoRAST has been pushing the federal government for a study of the 1944 Flood Control Act, which gave rise to the modern system of dams on the Missouri River. MoRAST members say that, given the existence of modern river uses not anticipated by the 1944 act, a review of the river-management purposes authorized by the act is long overdue.


Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand