Story Published:
Nov 4, 2009
Story Updated:
Oct 30, 2009
WASHINGTON – The BIA has denied the petition of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana to become federally recognized, leaving the tribe with the difficult task of fighting for recognition from Congress.
The denial came after months of delays from Obama administration officials and years of waiting by desperate tribal members.
George T. Skibine, acting principal deputy assistant secretary-Indian affairs with the Interior, made the announcement Oct. 27.
“Though the Little Shell cannot meet the mandatory criteria for federal acknowledgment through Interior’s administrative process, the U.S. Congress has the authority to recognize the Little Shell under pending legislation,” Skibine said.
John Sinclair, chairman of the tribe, said the congressional route will be very difficult, as there are many members of Congress to convince.
Federal recognition allows Indian tribes to establish a government-to-government relationship with the United States, making federal protection, services and benefits available.
Officials with the Clinton administration supported the tribe’s recognition in 2000, then the George W. Bush administration delayed a determination.
Current Interior officials said there was not enough evidence for the tribe to meet the legal requirements for federal recognition. They said the tribe didn’t satisfy three of the seven mandatory criteria for acknowledgment, specifically the requirements that a tribe:
• has been identified as an Indian entity on a substantially continuous basis at least since 1900;
• comprises a distinct community since historical times and maintains significant social relationships and interaction as part of a distinct community; and
• maintains political influence over a community of its members or over communities that combined into the petitioner.
The decision has stunned many tribal members, including Sinclair.
“It’s disappointing,” he said. “This was not the decision we hoped for.”
The petitioning group was made up of 4,332 members who live in Montana as well as outside of the state.
Members have long claimed that their ancestors originated as part of the historical Pembina Band of Chippewa Indians in the mid-19th century and then evolved into a separate group of mixed Indian ancestry in Montana by the early 20th century.
Interior’s new decision goes against a 2000 proposed finding from the department recommending acknowledgment of the Little Shell as an Indian tribe. The department said at the time that additional evidence could create a different factual record and provide more factual support to a final decision.
“This final determination concludes, however, that the petitioner’s response to the proposed finding does not present sufficient additional evidence or argument that justifies the proposed finding’s contemplated departures from precedent,” according to a statement from the department.
Officials said evidence shows external observers identified the petitioner as an Indian entity only since 1935, not 1900, as required by the regulations.
They said, too, that evidence demonstrates the tribe has not comprised a distinct community since historical times. Evidence also did not demonstrate that the tribe maintained political influence over a community of its members at any time or over communities that combined into the petitioner.
Interior’s decision is final and effective 90 days after publication of a notice in the federal register, unless the tribe or any interested party requests reconsideration with the Interior Board of Indian Appeals.
Only one tribe – the Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut – has previously won an appeal.
With those slim odds, the tribe is expected to push for congressional action to gain federal recognition.
At least two members of Congress from Montana – Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester – are supportive. They have jointly introduced a bill, known as S.1936, to recognize the tribe.
Both lawmakers were disappointed that the BIA denied recognition, they believe the tribe deserves federal status, especially after waiting more than 100 years.
Rep. Denny Rehberg of Montana has previously introduced H.R.3120, the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians Restoration Act of 2009. The legislation had not moved as of press time.
The state of Montana recognized the tribe nine years ago.
Earlier this year, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs Larry EchoHawk recused himself from deciding the tribe’s fate because the tribe has been represented by the Native American Rights Fund, an organization run by his brother.
Tuesday, Dec 8 at 11:00 AM Jesse Azure wrote ...
The federal gov.recognized the LittleShell when we recieved payments from the Pembina Judgement,the ten cent treaty. Are montana state officials all wrong?They recognize the LittleShell!!!! Always for the betterment of the tribe.
33300786Monday, Nov 9 at 4:09 PM CurtJ wrote ...
Waht gives the non natives the right to decide Native Americans are Native Americans and they belong to tribes? What Native wants a white man to tell him if he's a Native? Colonialism. Look it up and see if the centuries of invading weaker countries to steal their natural resources and lands for colonization has led to Terrorism. See if the murder of 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
31849759Saturday, Nov 7 at 10:48 PM Lorraine Romero wrote ...
I can't not believe this is happening again to The Little Shell Tribe. My people of the Little Shell Tribe have been living a night mare that will not END! Our ancestors and my generation having been fighting for so long to get recognized for up teen years. So,tell me how the hell do all you good ol' boys in Congress get your kicks by tell us that there isn't enough evidence. We will NOT GIVE UP. Lorraine Romero Little Shell Tribal Member
31769334Friday, Nov 6 at 2:30 PM Wallace Clark wrote ...
So Mr. Echohawk..Since you are in the seat to react not only the the Little Shell people's needs but also all the other relatives 'hard road' then please step up and let us see if you are true...Noyo Indian Community, CA
31709201Thursday, Nov 5 at 6:49 PM sistah buckskin wrote ...
the link says it all did the government misplace this document too...http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html
31663824Thursday, Nov 5 at 4:38 PM maynard wrote ...
lets see....assimilate....maybe we as a group learned too well the white way of learning. some of our parents, aunts uncles and grandparents were all sent off to government schools to learn and died there, an now you see unmarked graves at those sites an the government isn't even embarrassed, almost a touch like bosnia/serbian conflicts. part of another generation gone this time without the infected blankets. so easy for a government to sweep stuff like injustices under the rug an try to ignore.
31657081Thursday, Nov 5 at 2:59 PM AZ NDN wrote ...
go straight to Obama, he said today "he is on our side, understands how we were fogotten people" till now....lol seriously he has all the power now with all the ndn votes he got...
31651056Thursday, Nov 5 at 1:19 PM Malia wrote ...
Could someone tell me if the people deciding the fate of these tribes are of Native blood and understand that some records are verbal and not written because of the removals of the indigenous people? If they are non- native then why are they making the decisions? Or has our nation not evolved since the 1800's? This exact same thing happened to the MOWA Choctaw in Alabama, and they complied, yet the BIA said they did not. I agree with Sabor,all Native Nations join as one. See what happens!
31644231Thursday, Nov 5 at 12:43 PM MAURICE MANSA wrote ...
i do hope the Little Shell tribe is successful in their bid to be recognized by the BIA. the U.S.A. didn't take names while they took the lands of these and many other people, now you have to prove your the people they took the land from in the first place, talk about double jeopardy.
31641961Thursday, Nov 5 at 12:17 PM Pierced Earrings wrote ...
That is strange, my father (now deceased) was determined to be Little Shell Indian by the BIA. As Lorraine from above states," they took their land and now won't recognize them as Indian people. How can they maintain a tribal community without a community to maintain.
31640209Wednesday, Nov 4 at 10:36 PM Lorraine wrote ...
What do you mean, federally recognized? I dont understand this, they take your land then dont recognize the people they took it from. Here in NZ the Maori people have there own voice. What a backward country you have.
31612299Wednesday, Nov 4 at 6:37 PM Robert Xavier Betancourt Junior wrote ...
At least they have a tribal chairman not a CO CHAIR Wilson Rancheria. Maybe they can petition to secede from the United States cutting off funds in Montana.
31604056Wednesday, Nov 4 at 12:34 PM Anonymous wrote ...
Wouldn't the BIA then exclude indviduals within the adopting tribe? That would be just as bad.
31582229Wednesday, Nov 4 at 12:00 PM saber tooth montain writer wrote ...
about this federal recognition business, lets assume the group are skins; now, is it possible for this group to be adopted by a federally recognized tribe? instead of having around 500 separate groups, why not begin to coalesce into one large bubble, you might say. just a thought.
31579699Add a comment
Most Popular