Photo courtesy Aquinnah Wampanoag member Jennifer Randolph

This photo was taken on the Summer Solstice, June 20 - 21, off Oak Bluffs on the Aquinnah Wampanoag land on Marth'a Vineyard. If the Cape Wind energy plant is allowed to be built in Nantucket Sound, a sacred site to the Wampanoag people, Aquinnah Chairwoman Cheryl Andrews-Maltais fears her nation may be looking at a future similar to what’s going on in the Gulf Coast now.

Tools

USET, NCAI seek reversal of Cape Wind approval

By Gale Courey Toensing

MOBILE, Ala. – The two largest American Indian organizations are calling on the Obama administration to reverse its approval of a massive off shore wind energy project in Nantucket Sound, a sacred site to the Wampanoag people, and reconsider its decision before moving forward.

The United South and Eastern Tribes and the National Congress of American Indians both passed resolutions in opposition to the proposed Cape Wind industrial wind energy project in Nantucket Sound during their recent mid-year meetings in Mobile, Ala., and Rapid City, S.D., respectively.

The Cape Wind energy factory would be built across 25 square miles of public waters in Nantucket Sound in a triangle between Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket, and would include the construction of 130 wind turbines reaching 440 feet above water level, an electric service platform with 40,000 gallons of oil, more than 65 miles of buried transmission lines and other related equipment.

Nantucket Sound is a sacred site to the Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe on Martha’s Vineyard and to the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe. Not only is the eastern-oriented view a necessary component of the sunrise ceremonies performed by the People of the First Light, but the seabed was once dry land where their ancestors lived and died.

Both tribes vigorously opposed the project. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar made a well-publicized visit to the area in February, inviting the press to accompany him on a Coast Guard ship to the wind factory site in the middle of Horseshoe Shoal in Nantucket Sound.

Salazar’s task was to weigh the value the Obama administration places on respecting an irreplaceable and immovable American Indian sacred site against the worth and importance of a privately-owned for-profit renewable energy plant that could be built elsewhere.

On April 28, Salazar gave his stamp of approval to the plant. The project is still in the permitting process with local and federal agencies.

USET, which represents 25 federally acknowledged tribes from Maine to Florida, passed a resolution June 17 asking for a full reversal of the project.

“The USET Board of Directors calls upon the Department of Interior to reverse its decision with regard to the Cape Wind Project before any sites are damaged and to explain in detail its rationale for rejecting tribal proposals, especially in the context of similar development proposals across the United States, as well as rejecting tribal proposals to locate the project on alternative off-shore sites that would not interfere with or harm tribal spiritual interest,” the resolution says.

The resolution points out that state, federal and tribal historic preservation entities “expressed opposition and even alarm at the harm that this proposed project would do to ceremonial activities as well as to a site of extraordinary spiritual and cultural value.”

Among the opposing entities were the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation – expert entities within the Interior Department that Salazar was required by law to consult, but whose opinions he ultimately rejected, on the grounds that he disagreed with them.

The Cape Wind Project, which would be the first off-shore wind factory in the U.S., has been cited by Salazar and the Obama administration as a model of the off-shore wind energy factories they envision developing along the East Coast on sites that potentially could raise tribal objections similar to those raised against Cape Wind.

The USET resolution clearly states its priorities: “Indian country supports the development of renewable energy, but such development should not come at the expense of Native historic and cultural places and over the objections of tribal and cultural leaders.”

The resolution specifically mentions the San Francisco Peaks, where the federal government approved the use of treated sewerage to make snow at a ski resort, and Mount Taylor in New Mexico where mining companies have pending applications to mine uranium in areas that would impact tribal sacred sites, lands and resources.

NCAI passed an emergency resolution almost identical to USET’s a week later.

NCAI’s resolution does not call for a reversal of Salazar’s approval of Cape Wind, but asks Interior instead “to reconsider its decision with regard to the Cape Wind Project before any sites are damaged.”

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Anonymous said on Tuesday, Jul 13 at 3:10 PM

Everyone should see the YouTube video “fatal accident with vulture on a windmill”. A Griffon Vulture gets smashed out of the sky by the innocent looking blades of a propeller style wind turbine. The wind turbine in the video is spinning at just 12 rpm or about half speed. After seeing this you will understand what is coming to local and migratory bird populations, all over the world. Recently in the United Kingdom, a school, was forced to turn off their wind turbine because of the birds being killed by the spinning blades. The propeller-style wind turbine had tip speeds of 135 miles per hour and killed 14 birds in just six months. In comparison, the tens of thousands of large wind turbines installed in Europe and the United States have tip speeds of 220 miles per hour and are even more lethal. Worldwide, millions of birds are killed annually, but unlike the birds in the schoolyard, most of these birds drop to the ground with no witnesses. This cover-up has been going on for over 25 yrs

47395329
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wiegand said on Tuesday, Jul 13 at 3:03 PM

Over the last 25 years in Altamont Pass, more than 2,000 golden eagles have been killed by the blades of the propeller-style wind turbine. The corrupt wind/oil industry (they are one in the same) paid experts to say it was just an aberration and that Altamont was unique. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is also mixed up in all of this fraud because they deliberately looked the other way while wind farms were built in the habitat of the condor and whooping crane. They even helped write the “No Surprises” clause into federal law, which gives this industry a free pass for killing endangered species. The truth is no bird or bat is safe around a propeller-style wind turbine. The day is coming when far superior wind turbines, without the flawed deadly propeller design, will be implemented across the world. How long this will take depends on how long the bird and bat mortality lie is perpetuated.

47394724
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

WAMP1MASHPEE said on Tuesday, Jul 13 at 9:36 AM

WELL ITS ABOUT TIME PEOPLE WOKE UP MAYBE BIG DADDY WILL NOW

47363384
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Eva Mae said on Tuesday, Jul 13 at 7:14 AM

It is time. The time has come for the government to accept that some people worship differently than others and that it is a violation of their human rights to destroy or damage their sacred place. And for the government to accept that their sacred place could be built by the Creator instead of by a construction company. And that all groups do not have to be Christian to receive the protection of the government. A lot depends on the government now listening and acting from a more principled and less discriminatory place. It is time. USET and NCAI have stood up for this.

47354002
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

feather flight said on Tuesday, Jul 13 at 1:12 AM

I have many more heroes today! Chi Miigwech USET, NCAI and all others standing strong to defend sacred sites.

47346377
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand