Story Published:
Jun 15, 2009
Story Updated:
Jun 12, 2009
Many, if not most, Native people insist that their ancestors have lived on this continent since time immemorial, and some mainstream scientists are beginning to weigh in on their side.
Scholars are pushing evidence of human habitation in North America well beyond the non-Native accepted wisdom that places it at a relatively recent 13,000 to 14,000 years ago.
“Since Europeans came to the Americas, they have often been wrong about the Native inhabitants and Western science has not been immune to this problem,” said one Denver scientist May 29.
A perhaps-controversial 33,000 years ago, “and probably long before that,” people lived here, according to Steven R. Holen, curator of archaeology in the Denver Museum of Nature and Science’s Department of Anthropology.
“Several scientists, me included, are producing evidence of a much older Native American occupation of the continent,” he said, adding that, as has happened in the past, “the scientific establishment has underestimated the time depth of the Native American occupation of the Americas.”
A practitioner of experimental archaeology, Holen studies the patterns of breakage in mammoth bones, extrapolating and recreating the kind of instrument and force required to create such fractures and hypothesizing possible implements that could be made from the shattered remains.
“The only way these could be broken in the past as we see it is by humans using hammerstones.”
Although stone tools have not yet been found with the bones, “You don’t have to have stone tools – you have to have evidence of human technology.”
The uses of fractured bones may have varied, including that of the mammoth from Nebraska recently radiocarbon-dated at 33,000 before present (BP).
Sharp points may have been affixed to bone shafts or the bone may have been shaped into a tool to straighten shafts. Bone flakes could have been used as disposable choppers or temporary knives or other tools or utensils as needed by the continent’s inhabitants.
Holen describes the forceful impact that produces flakes from a resulting spiral fracture. A radiating line of fracture extends from the point of impact and makes it possible to determine the weight of the instrument that struck the blow, a scenario he was able to replicate in Africa on elephant bone, comparable in hardness to the bones of its mammoth relative.
Against all odds, one of only about 20 long-lived elephants in a nature preserve in Tanzania happened to die right beside the road, and the park service allowed Holen to take a single bone for testing. He fashioned a 9.5-pound instrument with a 2-inch-diameter striking head – the same size as a similar mammoth bone impact mark – and it took a younger fellow expeditionist 10 tries to fracture it.
The force required to create such impacts and the characteristics of the bones and their breakage appear to rule out such factors as damage from natural disturbance, gnawing by carnivores, or trampling by other large animals, Holen said, but he knows his findings may not be universally accepted, at least immediately, particularly in terms of the dates of human habitation they suggest.
“Scientists from several major universities, especially in western states like Nevada, Wyoming, Arizona and Alaska still ‘know’ that Native Americans have not been in North America before approximately 14,000 years ago, or just prior to Clovis culture.
“But no one has demonstrated there is a natural way the bones could be broken in these patterns. No one has yet disproved my findings.”
The 33,000-year date of the mastodon bone is “very preliminary,” he said. “We haven’t excavated yet, but it looks good at this point.” Similar fractured bones of great age have been found on the Old Crow River in the Yukon, in Europe and Siberia, and at Clovis sites.
Pushing the clock back further still, Holen said he is working on a site that is “probably much older” than the 33,000-year-old evidence he now has, but he declined to specify at this time how old the site could prove to be, or its general location.
“When I am asked the question, ‘When did people first arrive in the Americas?’ My answer now is that we do not know. I think that the term ‘from time immemorial’ may be the most accurate statement for Native American time depth in the Americas, just as many traditional Native people say.”
Tuesday, Dec 1 at 10:20 AM Loki wrote ...
I also believe that the ice age was a major period of migration of the peoples of the Americas to make their homes in North America, there may also be other peoples coming from lesser known locales that go back anything up to 150 to 200 K before Earth is far older and in Native myth, between the lines you can find in the four worlds, epochs that are so vast one day this will be proven I know
32900499Monday, Aug 31 at 10:50 AM Hawksblood wrote ...
I am not a scientist. I can tell you Most native people came into the us from other places. Yes the native people say they had distant family here. There were two groups here Hopi and Yetti and maybe a few other visitors from off this planet. But the big bang and we are all one will be proven wrong in a few years . All religions will be proven wrong very soon. Then what. People need to look outside the little box they live. Stat thinking for themselves. Theries are just thar T Hawk
28522417Wednesday, Jun 24 at 4:44 PM hartman deetz wrote ...
this is one of manny finds that disprove the clovis first theory. archological sites are dug in such a way that they dig as deep as they expect to find anything, so you cant find what your not looking for i do think people crossed the bering straights, and then mixed in with everyone else who was allready here. the technology it takes to survive the artic cold is far more advanced than the technology to make an ocean passage, but apparently some folks still expect to find footprints in the sand?
24908906Wednesday, Jun 24 at 6:33 AM Bill in SD wrote ...
The bigger question to me is why does it matter so much to scientists and others. What will be the result of determining when or if Native People arrived here. Will they get their lands, culture, language and rights back. What if this effort was applied to tackling problems (ie. health, education, cultural preservation) facing present-day Native People.
24862709Tuesday, Jun 23 at 11:08 PM John Brown wrote ...
I am glad that someone has listened. It is about time. A theory aboutt iceages and glaciers just don't make it. I wonder how many people know that in certain places in the northern parts of the Great Lakes they have found trees and villages at a depth of 500 feet or more, that date to over 10000 years. How did they find them, they just asked the Elders of the First Nations there. You can't have a glacier, when you have trees and villages at the bottom of the lake.
24796764Tuesday, Jun 23 at 9:15 PM Sarah wrote ...
Certainly we came from the stars, as did all matter. In a giant fusion known as the big bang. Keep in mind that science is often rewritten as new evidence is found, and that ethical legislature comes from sound science. I was born in the United States, descended from people who also crossed an ocean to follow opportunity. In the present age, aren't we all man, all one? Aren't biologists making leaps forward to prove that all life originated from a single source, is that not divine in itself?
24722889Monday, Jun 22 at 7:11 PM Timeline recap: wrote ...
Candace says she's not an immigrant, but was made in the USA, which is a political entity invented around 225 years ago. Some Bible believers may believe everyone arrived on earth within the last 6,000 years, but no one believes Europeans were here before Indians. Scientists know Indians' ancestors lived in what we now call the Western Hemisphere, with the mammoths, thousands of years before Europeans got here and committed atrocities, but how many thousands of years: 14k, 33k, 75k? I say >45k.
24258189Sunday, Jun 21 at 11:55 PM chris wrote ...
if the Bering theory held any truth...the major pyramids and civilizations would be in California-not the far flung jungles of South America...
24216692Sunday, Jun 21 at 10:31 AM Candace Colbert Odom wrote ...
I am full-blood Native American, half Arapaho and half Kiowa and I can say I am not an immigrant from anywhere else and I was made in the USA... Let them keep digging, I know our ancestors were here along with the Mammoths for thousands of years before any white man step foot on this continent!!!
24195857Saturday, Jun 20 at 1:02 PM johnypaycut wrote ...
sounds possible(but unlikely to be proven,at least for now) i'l believe the older than 14,000 theory, but it'l take more to convince me about 33,000 yrs(or earlier)
24169602Saturday, Jun 20 at 2:08 AM Mz Wild wrote ...
At last! I wrote in a column many years ago that the mad white man's science would eventually prove us right, we have always been here and if the Bering Strait theory holds at all, it went the other way.They already know it, now we just have choke it out of them. Anyone 'wit me?
24155834Friday, Jun 19 at 1:43 PM CurtJ wrote ...
The scientists are trying hard to say the whiteman was here first. To justify the theft of the Native Americans natural resources and lands for colonization. With enslavement, rape, murder and genocide of the Indigenous inhabitants. If they lie long enough they can convince themselves but not us. The Neo Con Conglomerates who bought off our gov't will never admit to their Colonialism, because to do so, they will have to admit their policies of theft and murder leads to Terrorism!
24121172Friday, Jun 19 at 2:45 AM 7armadillos wrote ...
Bering Strait? How about "In the days of Peleg the lands were divided." Gen 10:25 We were on this land when it divided from the rest of the land. Continents were formed with people already on them.
24092444Thursday, Jun 18 at 12:53 PM White Crow wrote ...
A quote from a Maliceet Elder woman: “We are People of the Stars and that is where we came from!” How can you put a date on that?
24056409Wednesday, Jun 17 at 4:12 PM wildbillybc wrote ...
there are still many people that believe that humankind is 6000 years old, and no amount of proof will be able to dissuade them. too bad.
23996652Wednesday, Jun 17 at 3:35 PM Richard wrote ...
In 1958 a amature archeolgist discovered a mamonth hip bone inscribed with drawings of extinct animals. It was fossilized, it has been dated to 250000yrs before the present. not once but three times. Academia buried this find, Read the untold story of the americas by Richard Hardaker. History is being rewritten as we speak this time without the Church.
23993857Wednesday, Jun 17 at 11:48 AM Roger Garcia-Marenco wrote ...
The times people from North Eastern Asia crossed Bearing following the food and came into this continent should be some ten thousand years after they came over there so it was around 40-50 thousand yead ago but the guys that make a living out of the Clovis tale are still alive and need it to survive so we will wait till they die to spread the truth. The problem is that the Abraham's tale has been around for 5K years and people still believe it although there is no proof that it was for real.
23971172Tuesday, Jun 16 at 8:42 PM Jake wrote ...
We know Australian aborigines crossed vast amounts of water 40-70K years ago, so we should not be surprised that the ancients who 'settled' the Americas traveled just off of the coasts well before the end of the ice ages. They lived off of the sea, then penetrated inland up the rivers and finally 'landed' on the shores of lakes. One with the Earth, they flowed like the water that they traveled on. Traces of their travels lie under the sea, which has risen over 300 feet since they arrived.
23936509Tuesday, Jun 16 at 7:25 PM Greg wrote ...
My ancestral belief system says the humans race is 6000 years old and started in Eden. I have no trouble discounting that belief. Living Amerindians have no more of an idea where their ancestors were 12 thousand years ago then I do for my own. Incidentally, one percent is a heck of a big sample. Poll samples are a few thousand out of 100 million. All you need is a scientifically selected sample that is representative of the population.
23932562Tuesday, Jun 16 at 7:09 PM Tay wrote ...
Scientists on the whole are quite slow and hard-headed; that's why they have to use the crutch of science in order to make up for their lack of common sense. When a scientist of the mind can actually make one, I'll take him seriously. When a biologist can make a seed that grows from a handful of dirt, I'll recognize some authority.
23931774Tuesday, Jun 16 at 6:29 PM Peter Vernon wrote ...
The scientific establishment need to allow scientists to look at evidence that might be different than what current theory allows for. We need to follow where the evidence takes us.
23929674Tuesday, Jun 16 at 6:07 PM farang wrote ...
How about this: NOBODY knows for sure. Just like the scientist states in the last sentence. The DNA evidence points to an origin for most native Americans where Asia meets Europe. As the article states, the bones show damage like those found in Siberia: the Mammoth hunter culture, that built huts from mammoth bones. No "Cave" And, forensic analysis of some Egyptian mummies show trace amounts of tobacco and coca(ine) residue. Trade with South America Native cultures. No one knows "for sure."
23928584Tuesday, Jun 16 at 5:43 PM nativescholar1 wrote ...
The molecular evidence is a hypothesis based on less than 1 percent of the overall Native American population. 1 % DID YOU HEAR ME, no sane scientist would make truth statements based on having less than 1 % of the overall data pool available. It take an Indian to call out the scientist on their ( truth statements) with no data or less than 1 % of the data to support their assumptions
23927279Tuesday, Jun 16 at 2:46 PM Louis wrote ...
Why all the racism? Who cares, were all humans here. Lets keep dredging up the past about people who are long dead and all the wrongs man has done to man for thousands of years. No peoples are innocent.
23914967Tuesday, Jun 16 at 1:20 PM Jay Napeahi wrote ...
Bones? Are you f'n kidding me. White folks are Indians who lost thier color.
23908799Tuesday, Jun 16 at 1:10 PM rezzie wrote ...
They should of been listening to our creation stories and save them them theories of where they think we came from. If some did migrate here, it was during the last Ice age. White people just want to justify the atrocities they committed while coming here. They were actually the first illegal aliens.
23907987Tuesday, Jun 16 at 12:36 PM Phoenix Navajo wrote ...
Time and time again, there arises more and more evidence to back up what Native Americans already know and have said. Because of the orthodox nature of western science, it cannot bring itself to acknowledge, how wrong they are. Instead the "Clovis Police" are sent out to discredit the research and even the researcher in a poor attempt to keep the foundation of untruth intact and hence, many jobs and books intact. By its very nature western science cannot say simply, "We were wrong".
23905092Tuesday, Jun 16 at 12:31 PM Waminega wrote ...
THEORIES... are dime a dozen...I always say IF you dig deeper in the Bering Strait,(about 20 feet deeper) they will find footprints going over there, our ancient hunters went over there seeking foods...following the Herds...that theory is just as important than others always saying WE weren't here or we came from someplace else....so, stick that in your theories corn-cob pipe and smoke it....
23904614Tuesday, Jun 16 at 11:48 AM Anonymous wrote ...
It is simply a conjecture. Given the molecular evidence of a recent arrival (17-20 thousand years b.p.), this idea is most likely wrong.
23901312Tuesday, Jun 16 at 11:38 AM hawk wrote ...
Leave the mounds ALONE.
23900489Tuesday, Jun 16 at 11:35 AM josephine james wrote ...
A history of American Indian achievement dvd mentions this. I recommend this dvd, as it is very infomative.
23900229Tuesday, Jun 16 at 10:22 AM Tantelaus wrote ...
There were three separate migrations during the glacial periods where the natives walked across the Bering Sea. One 50 thousand, one 30 thousand and one 10 thousand. Whites will not admit this because all of their European relatives were still living in caves in southern Europe.
23894059Tuesday, Jun 16 at 9:44 AM john esposito wrote ...
There is currently talk of an archaeological undertaking in Ashland/Bayfield counties where several mounds (some underwater) will be excavated. Some are in the shape of ancient symbols and are preliminarily old enough to expect the history of this area to be rewritten. I have been told the reason there is only "talk" at this point is to allow findings to be confirmed so an exclusive, official press release can occur. It will supposedly happen before the summer's out. We'll see.
23891519Add a comment
Most Popular