Tools

House approves Virginia tribes’ federal recognition bill

By Bobbie Whitehead, Today correspondent

WASHINGTON – With the House of Representatives’ June 3 approval, some members of six Virginia Indian tribes say they’re hoping their federal recognition bill will become law this year.

Members of the House approved for a second time the Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2009.

“I’m happy that it passed, and we can move on to devote our time to getting it passed in the Senate,” said Wayne Adkins, Chickahominy, president of the Virginia Indian Tribal Alliance for Life. “We thank Congressman Moran and his staff for their work.”

Written and introduced by Congressman Jim Moran, the bill first received approval by the House in 2007 but failed to move in the Senate.

But this time could be different. Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., with co-sponsor Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., introduced a companion bill to grant tribes federal recognition the same day the House approved it.

“I applaud Congressman Moran’s tireless work shepherding this important bill through the House,” Webb said. “It’s time for these six Virginia tribes to join our nation’s 562 other federally recognized tribes.”

Virginia Indians’ history is unique in two important ways, which is why they don’t currently have federal recognition, Moran said.

Members of the six Virginia tribes are direct descendants of the Indians who enabled the English at Jamestown to survive harsh winters in the early 1600s.

“Virginia’s tribes have waited 400 years to receive their federal recognition. We are one step closer to closing a sad chapter in our nation’s history, one that saw the exploitation and denigration of Virginia’s Indians” Moran said. “These tribes, descendants of those that greeted the first English settlers at Jamestown, deserve the same rights afforded the 562 tribes that are currently federally recognized.”

Ironically, Virginia’s tribes signed treaties with the kings of England, not the U.S. federal government.

Moran said the tribes’ documented history was nearly erased when Virginia officials for up to 50 years “waged a war” to destroy all state and courthouse records of the American Indians as a result of a 1924 Racial Integrity Act.

In actions Moran described as “Orwellian,” state officials reclassified Virginia Indians as “colored” on state and courthouse documents such as birth, marriage and death records. Those who called themselves Indian risked being jailed for up to one year, marriage licenses were denied and babies wouldn’t be released from the hospital unless the “colored” ethnicity was selected.

“We are rectifying this wrong today,” Moran told the House.

Though some critics have argued against the bill, saying the tribes would be able to open and operate gaming facilities on their land, the six tribes agreed to an amendment that would prevent them from utilizing the federal Indian gaming act. Even if the state of Virginia changes its laws in the future and allows gaming, the tribes will not be allowed to operate gaming facilities on their property.

The six Virginia tribes seeking recognition – the Chickahominy Tribe, Chickahominy Indian Tribe Eastern Division, the Upper Mattaponi, the Rappahannock Tribe, the Monacan Tribe, and the Nansemond Tribe – made it through the recognition bill approval process this far during the last Congressional session in 2007, and now some members say they’re ready to focus their efforts on approval by the Senate.

“I hope it means more good news for the rest of the year,” said Chief Ken Adams of the Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe. “I’m hoping we complete it this year. Maybe everything will go our way this year.”

Webb and members of his legislative team and staff members of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs earlier this year toured the six tribes’ property.

Webb’s legislation will be reviewed and marked-up by the SCIA in a hearing before reaching the full Senate body for a final vote, according to his office.

“A good deal of staff time and resources have gone into laying the groundwork for the reintroduction of this bill to ensure a successful outcome in this Congress.”

Tuesday, Jun 30 at 7:05 PM For Our Ancestors wrote ...

Seeking Federal recognition while depriving other tribes of their right to State recognition. Shameful!

25214322
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jun 27 at 3:51 PM Nick "a white man" wrote ...

I guess I would be considered white. I am on this website because of an assignment for school. I am saddened to hear the remaining anger. I saw this act as a very positive movement for the Indian culture. Kermet, you are not all Mexicans in "our" eyes. People, we need to stop the hate together.We will never move forward if we keep looking back.

25068144
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jun 27 at 3:42 PM Nick the white man wrote ...

I'm sorry to discover the perception on this website. I saw this as an advancement of feeling and attitude towards Indians. I was very excited to discover the advancement in a widely considered confederate state. Kermet, so you know I think it is unfair to say that you are all It's time we come together.

25067959
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, Jun 26 at 9:48 AM Star. wrote ...

Indigenous people have never NOT known who (we) are. Federal recognition is just an icing on a cake. The matter of "white priviledge" e.g. greed, subterfuge, disrespect, et al occurs/manifests with different faces. "Holding" babies for 'ransom' for false documentation is not surprising considering the source but nonetheless bewildering. We're Still Here! How many Indians risked being jailed, rather than deny who they were? The enemy is still afraid, after 400 years!

25007692
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, Jun 25 at 7:13 AM Long Standing Bear Chief wrote ...

I am pleased to know that the Indian Nations of Virginia will be recognized by the People of the United States as Indians, indigenous to this country with rights of nationhood. But please tell me the name of the person(s) with the slave holders mentality who says these indigenous people cannot engage in the gaming industry. Slavery is DEAD! We do not need to bow down to these people with their much diluted royal blood. Honestly do they think they are some kind of God? Indigenous people stand up!

24933614
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jun 20 at 12:02 AM Kermit Frazier wrote ...

Aw, heck! We're all Mexicans in their eyes, anyway. Besides, anything that can be successfully negotiated today can be successfully re-negotiated tomorrow!

24153477
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, Jun 19 at 11:39 AM Me lty2k84 wrote ...

Its messed up that the Native Indians agreed to that amendment that could help them in advancing. Are they aware of this?

24113042
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Jun 17 at 5:44 AM A ?Virginia? Indian wrote ...

There should be nothing less for the "?Virginia? Indians" than UNCONDITIONAL RECOGNITION. This "agreement" to give up gaming and jurisdiction is being IMPOSED on the tribes by those writing the legislation. "Say you accept it or it won't pass". There is no negotiation in this. Do these tribes fight for the rights that ALL other tribes have and defer, possibly for many years or decades, the ability to assist their elders and educate their youth -OR- obtain the opportunity to sit "at the table"?

23949762
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, Jun 16 at 11:46 PM Triniti Braided Blood wrote ...

Well, hasn't this been a long time coming? Years ago, some bigoted white Congressmen didn't want VA Indians to retain their native status because they had "mongrelized" with the African-American community. Mongrelized--really? We're all HUMAN, and we're all RELATED. The audacity of some people....

23944374
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand