Mazama Forest

Carol Craig

Klamath tribal representative Will Hatcher (right) and a representative stood above Mazama Forest.

Tools

Klamath Tribes to buy 90,000-acre Mazama Forest

By Terri C. Hansen, Today correspondent

CHILOQUIN, Ore. – It’s a new chapter in the history of the landless Klamath Tribes in southern Oregon. They’re buying back part of their lost reservation – and with that returns their tradition of caring for and being nurtured by their native land.

The Klamath, Modoc and Yahooskin peoples who make up the Klamath Tribes, entered into an option agreement Dec. 18 to purchase the 90,000-acre Mazama Forest in south central Oregon near their tribal home of Chiloquin.

The forest was part of 1.2 million acres reserved for them in an 1864 treaty, but liquidated by Congress in 1954 during the now repudiated policies of the Termination Era. The tribe regained federal recognition in 1968 – but not their reservation.

“People have asked me, what will you do to get the land back? And I’ve told them, ‘whatever it takes,’” said Klamath tribal chairman Joe Kirk. “And now I’m excited.” Two years ago the tribe asked the national conservation organization Trust for Public Lands for help in buying their land back. “They really beat the streets for us,” he said.

“The land is important to this wrongly terminated tribal nation,” said Charles F. Sams III, director of TPL’s Tribal and Native Lands Program. “It’s a major achievement in their long struggle back to cultural independence and economic self-reliance.” The tribe plans to take ownership of the land this fall.

Not only will land provide the tribe with financial stability, “it’s a significant part of our spiritual and cultural identity,” Kirk said. “There are culturally sensitive areas to take care of, that hopefully have not been lost to past activities.”

The federal government will pay $21 million to cover part of the cost of the land, as part of the $1 billion Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, which includes the agreement last summer to remove four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River, blamed for destroying salmon runs in the river and in the Pacific Ocean.

A handful of locals in the rural communities of the Klamath Basin are opposed to the plan. “Why should the taxpayers foot the bill to buy land to establish a separate country for the Klamath Tribes? Isn’t this fostering separatism, apartheid and racism?” asked a letter to the editor signed “we in the Basin Alliance.”

And last August the group, who calls itself the Klamath Basin Alliance, Inc., placed a display ad in the local paper asking readers to sign a form that would reject the land agreement. The ad, which didn’t list any groups or people who make up the “Alliance,” argued that the Klamath Tribes sold their reservation as “willing sellers,” and they’ll get 92,000 acres of land bought with “taxpayer money.”

But the ad was deceiving. The federal government is paying about two-thirds the cost of the yet to be appraised land. The Klamath Tribes is responsible for the rest.

In treaties with the United States, the Klamath peoples ceded 18 million acres of prime timber and farmland for guarantees in perpetuity of their sovereignty, a 2.2 million acre reservation, the protection of their natural resources, and social services that included health care, education and housing.

By 1953, the tribe was nearly at an economic par with mainstream society. Tribal members didn’t receive land payments when they were terminated; instead they were paid for the value of the ponderosa pine on the land. The loss of land and social services for the tribe following termination is estimated well in excess of $200 million.

Racism and bigotry is hard for Kirk to understand. “I think we should maintain our identities, and emphasize our commonalties,” he said. The tribe is looking to foster good will among the tribes’ non-supporters. “The tribe is the fourth largest employer in the county. It has a rippling effect. Say if our casino closed, folks working for the Pepsi plant would lose their jobs.”

The tribe has developed a forest restoration and management plan for the Mazama Forest that will be a cornerstone for their economic development. Improving the health of the forest is a priority. “Portions of the land have been over-harvested, and some hasn’t been managed well at all,” Kirk said. The tribe plans to manage the forest in an environmentally sound manner to provide a steady supply of timber to their tribal enterprises planned at the tribes’ Giiwas Green Enterprise Park, 25 miles from Chiloquin.

Sunday, Jan 11 at 11:37 PM Susan Esparza wrote ...

Klamath Basin Alliance. The land was theirs in a treaty and set aside for them in 1864, then stolen back in 1954! It's theirs and always has been. These people have been waiting for a long time. Not different than the Black Hills in South Dakota stolen from the Sioux. It amazes me the people of the US are so shocked about thier 401K's and the rest that is evaporating befor their eyes. This is a time of Purification People, Your hungry greed has finally come full circle.This is how it works.

14720453 Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, Jan 8 at 1:30 PM A California teacher in Muwekma "Ohlone" Territory wrote ...

Awesome!!! I hope many of our unrecognized and landless Calif ornia tribes will eventually get some of our forests, prairies, and coastline back too.

14577933 Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, Jan 6 at 3:46 PM Kandis Reyes, Klamath wrote ...

All I can say, "It's about time!"

14475693 Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, Dec 30 at 4:56 PM Connie wrote ...

Yah-Hoo!! A co-worker recently told me I was a bigot and a racist for this same exact issue. Way to go, Klamaths!!

14243978 Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Monday, Dec 29 at 2:45 PM Benjamin Kinzer wrote ...

You have my full support in the purchase!

14197259 Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Monday, Dec 29 at 1:20 PM David Velarde Jr wrote ...

One of the reasons I went on the 1978 Longest Walk was because I knew some Klamath people and how they suffered as a result of loss of their lands.

14193353 Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand