Tools

Different factors at play in tribal cases

By Rochelle Hines, The Associated Press

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) – A lack of internal controls, a greater law enforcement focus on corruption and human nature may all factor into a series of recent cases related to American Indian tribes, a federal prosecutor said Dec. 15.

A federal jury recently convicted a former secretary-treasurer for the Apache Tribe on 33 embezzlement counts, accusing her of diverting tribal tax revenue into a bank account she controlled.

In another case, an ex-member of the Seminole Nation Council pleaded guilty to obstruction of the due administration of justice, stemming from allegations he accepted bribes from a tribal casino supplier in exchange for his power to impact business transactions.

John Richter, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma, said Dec. 15 it’s not always fair to generalize, but what is being seen in some recent tribal-related cases occurs to some degree in any institution, be it political or financial.

“What we find in these investigations is individuals who have essentially used tribal funds as sort of their personal piggy banks,” said Richter, whose office handled the Apache Tribe case and a series of cases involving former officials with the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes.

“Instead of serving as duly elected officials or public officials and meeting their fiduciary responsibilities to use tribal funds to the benefit of tribal members, they’ve chosen to use tribal funds for their own personal benefit and aggrandizement.”

Doug Horn, the first assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, said there hasn’t been an increased effort at tribe-related prosecutions by that office.

“We’ve always had at least two attorneys out of our office who do nothing but Indian crimes” or crimes on Indian land, said Horn, whose office handled the Seminole Nation case.

Horn declined to answer questions about the Seminole Nation case, saying it was still under investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Linda Epperley, who handled the case, was not available for comment.

Calls from The Associated Press seeking comment about the cases from officials with the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes and the Seminole Nation weren’t immediately returned Dec. 15.

According to prosecutors, evidence showed that Emily Saupitty spent money embezzled from the Apache Tribe on items like travel and to pay people for political support as she ran for tribal offices.

Saupitty, 53, of Apache, said Dec. 15 the case involved a tribal dispute and she was “found guilty of helping my people.”

“They said I wasn’t a tax commissioner, but I never legally have been taken out” of that position, she said. “The other issue was whether I had the authority to continue to operate in the manner that they allowed me since 2002.”

Saupitty said a percentage of tribal tax collections was supposed to be used to pay for the tribe’s tax commission expenses, including an attorney who helped her conduct investigations.

She also said tribal Chairman Alonzo Chalepah was unqualified to speak or act on behalf of the tribe. Members voted to recall Chalepah and Vice Chairman Mary Rivera at a special meeting, but the vote has been called unconstitutional.

Richter said federal prosecutors are sometimes put in the position of discerning whether an allegation by a tribal member against an official is politically motivated or based on facts.

“Someone is using the allegation for political advantage and it’s often true, as was evidenced by Emily Saupitty’s case,” he said.

In the Seminole Nation case, Ricky Van Deer entered a guilty plea just as his trial was about to begin. Deer’s telephone number in Seminole is unpublished and he couldn’t be reached for comment.

Richter said with all embezzlement cases, control mechanisms have failed at some point.

“We see, depending on the tribe or the political institution, differing degrees of record keeping in terms of quality and quantity,” he said. “But certainly, the better your internal accounting controls, the harder it is for individuals who wish to embezzle.”

Richter said the number of tribe-related corruption cases in the past 18 months also is a testament to his office’s success in uncovering and prosecuting crimes.

“There has been a focus on public corruption during my tenure and this is one of the fruits of it,” he said.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand