Gale Courey Toensing Indian Country Today

National Indian Gaming Association Chairman Ernie Stevens Jr. presented a Navajo blanket to Richard Tall Bear, the late Floyd Westerman’s son, at a tribute to Westerman during the Chairman’s Reception at Indian Gaming ’09.

Tools

NIGA/NCAI unite to fight Employee Free Choice Act

By Gale Courey Toensing

The National Indian Gaming Association has adopted a resolution opposing the Employee Free Choice Act unless it is amended to acknowledge sovereign tribal nations as governments.

The resolution was passed during NIGA’s annual meeting during the Indian Gaming ’09 Trade Show and Convention held April 12 – 16.

The resolution was introduced to the association’s member tribes April 14, and adopted unanimously the next day after members met in caucuses and discussed the resolution.

The EFCA is pending legislation in Congress and the Senate. The bill’s purpose is “to amend the National Labor Relations Act to establish an easier system to enable employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices.” The bill was introduced to Congress by U.S. Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., and has more than 220 co-sponsors.

 

Gale Courey Toensing  Indian Country Today

National Indian Gaming Association board members presented a check for $54,560 to the Spirit of Sovereignty Foundation during the Chairman’s Reception at Indian Gaming ’09. The foundation was founded by NIGA to provide scholarships to Indian university students.

To form a union, employees currently gather signatures on cards and can seek a vote to unionize once 30 percent of the employees have signed. The employer then holds a secret ballot election in which all the employees that would form the collective bargaining unit may vote.

The proposed EFCA would change the procedure to require the National Labor Relations Board to certify the union as a bargaining unit without requiring the employer to hold an election once a majority of employees sign cards.

The EFCA battle is a top priority in Indian country. If passed, the EFCA would forward a creeping erosion of tribal sovereignty in the area of labor relations on tribal land. For 75 years after the National Labor Relations Act was created in 1935, tribes were treated as governments in terms of their employees on reservations. That changed in 2007 when a federal circuit court upheld a National Labor Relations Board ruling that a casino owned by the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians was subject to federal labor laws.

“Tribes are recognized in the Constitution as governments; tribes should be recognized in the statutes as governments,” NIGA Executive Director Mark Van Norman said. “We’re going to devote a lot of time and energy to securing the treatment of tribes as governments under EFCA and the NLRA.”

During the discussion of the resolution, Ron Allen, chairman of the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, suggested a strategic alliance with the National Congress of American Indians.

“I’ve always been a big proponent of NIGA and NCAI working together on these matters. It seems to me, when it’s a gaming matter, we should always have the two organizations coordinate to accomplish the objective.”

Out of that suggestion, NIGA changed the title of its resolution to match a resolution passed earlier this year by NCAI: “Supporting Treatment of Indian Tribes as Governments for Purposes of the National Labor Relations Act and Opposing Amendments to the NLRA That Do Not Include Protections for Tribal Sovereignty.”

The resolution has a number of “whereas” clauses, many of which reiterate the theme of tribal sovereignty, including the confirmation of tribal sovereignty in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the reminder that “Indian tribes are sovereigns that pre-date the United States, with prior and treaty protected rights to self-government and to our Indian lands.”

The resolution calls for an amendment to the NLRA as part of the EFCA to say that the term “employer,” in addition to states and their local subdivisions, also includes “any federally recognized Indian tribe, or subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof, or any wholly owned tribal government corporation.”

The Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and other tribes have passed similar resolutions opposing the EFCA without the amendment exempting tribal nations. NIGA leaders urged individual tribes to contact their senators and congressional representatives to oppose the EFCA.

 

Wednesday, Sep 30 at 5:43 AM sohbet odaları wrote ...

As a sovereign nation, it should be up to the tribe to decide. On the Navajo Nation, the tribe allows and supports labor unions. Labor unions operate on the reservation at the coal mines, power plants, and within the tribal government. Finally, the Navajo Nation does have a 3 branch government, an extensive judicial branch (family courts, district courts, peacemaking courts

29888492
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Sep 30 at 5:36 AM dainel wrote ...

it may can get useful chat siteleri information from this post, canli sohbet is there anyone chat odaları having information about projects like 29888327

Tuesday, Jul 21 at 1:03 AM Betancour wrote ...

A few greedy people rich. Honest, fair people benefit from unions and support them. Rich and corrupt individuals and corporations are very afraid of organized workers, whatever their background.Buy Term Paper | Thesis Help

26470079
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, Jul 21 at 1:00 AM Ortan wrote ...

others which are implied, but confirmed once adjudicated in courts. Employee relations is not new - read the fine print on any PL93-638 contract or grant document.

26470004
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, May 29 at 3:16 PM gm loser wrote ...

Look what unions did to the U.S. Auto Industry.

22898414
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Apr 25 at 5:49 PM Anonymous wrote ...

Some tribes wish to keep power by preventing reservation officers from becoming sworn just so more crime can occur. The other choice is to let the workers unionize thus losing more power. Sounds like a pickle, I think you should swear your tribal security or patrols into position.

20219007
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Apr 25 at 5:45 PM Secret agent man wrote ...

Depending on the tribe; greed, empty promises and work exploitation occurs all for a few more casino dollars. Being fired becasue a tribal member has a personal beef is bull. Lets all get along!

20218912
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, Apr 24 at 7:32 PM JimInMt wrote ...

Sovereign now means the puppet Tribal governments are free to be as crooked and corrupt as possible taking advantage of workers and tribal members while making a few greedy people rich. Honest, fair people benefit from unions and support them. Rich and corrupt individuals and corporations are very afraid of organized workers, whatever their background.

20192056
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Apr 22 at 11:15 PM Wise One wrote ...

It is "only fitting" that NIGA oppose organized unions as has been historically waged in Las Vegas - organized crime or mafia controlled. Sovereignty has always been limited, especially when dealing with federal mandates. Examples includes, fuel taxes, employee/IRS taxes, Major crimes investigation/FBI, BIA authorizations, etc., and others which are implied, but confirmed once adjudicated in courts. Employee relations is not new - read the fine print on any PL93-638 contract or grant document.

20091506
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tuesday, Apr 21 at 2:36 PM Clarence wrote ...

As a sovereign nation, it should be up to the tribe to decide. On the Navajo Nation, the tribe allows and supports labor unions. Labor unions operate on the reservation at the coal mines, power plants, and within the tribal government. Finally, the Navajo Nation does have a 3 branch government, an extensive judicial branch (family courts, district courts, peacemaking courts, Supreme Courts), codified laws, case law, law enforcement officers, rangers, and cells (jails).

19963251
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Apr 18 at 2:04 AM Unsure wrote ...

I've always been big fan of keeping sovereignty against the ever eroding policies of the US but something about this NIGA/NCAI doesn't sit right. I think I would be less wary if NIGA was not involved. Bottom line first nation industries need unions and they need their sovereignty, at least in my opinion.

19816432
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, Apr 17 at 1:47 PM Robert Betancour wrote ...

First the tribes should have their own magistrate and holding cell or they still will have to abide by Federal Law. A sovereign has its own courts and police which must exist first.

19790277
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand