Tools

EchoHawk apologizes to Idaho tribes for past gaming positions

By Rob Capriccioso

WASHINGTON – Larry EchoHawk gained notoriety in recent days as word traveled that President Barack Obama would likely nominate him to become assistant secretary of Indian affairs at the Department of Interior. But in a day and age when even the nominations of the president’s top supporters, including former Sen. Tom Daschle, can be stymied by controversy, EchoHawk seems not to be taking any chances.

Accounts from tribal officials indicate that EchoHawk has recently been burning up the wires trying to get tribes in his home state of Idaho and around the country to support his appointment. Indian Country Today first reported EchoHawk’s vying for the position on Jan. 22.

The Pawnee tribal member’s efforts have come after some have argued that tribes have big reasons for concern, despite his longtime advocacy and support of Indian issues.

The biggest strike against EchoHawk has been repeated time and again throughout Indian country: When he served as Idaho’s attorney general from 1991 to 1995, he called on the governor to change the language of state legislation so the state no longer would have a legal obligation under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to negotiate for Class III gaming with Idaho’s tribes.

It’s a true charge, and EchoHawk is now making a special effort to indicate that he isn’t in favor of taking away any tribal gaming rights if he gets the nod to head the BIA.

Proof comes in a Jan. 28 letter from James Allan, chief of the Coeur d’Alene Tribe to President Barack Obama, in which the chairman indicates that he believes EchoHawk to be a “great choice for the position.”

Coeur d’Alene tribal leaders had previously expressed skepticism about EchoHawk’s stances on tribal gaming, especially given his opinions when he served as attorney general.

But in the letter, Allan said EchoHawk recently “personally called” the vice chairman of the tribe, Ernest Stensgar, to answer the tribe’s concerns – and to apologize.

“His answers were honest and from the heart,” Allan wrote. “We all make mistakes in life. When I heard that Mr. EchoHawk regretted the actions he took as Idaho’s attorney general against gaming during the 90s, it eased our fears and put an end to negative speculation that had clouded his nomination.

“Mr. EchoHawk’s continued support of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act is very important to all tribes because it goes to the very core of being sovereign. Any diminishment of our ability to determine our own destiny would be a terrible step backward. Mr. EchoHawk’s heritage, experience and wisdom will serve Indian people well once his appointment is confirmed. We wish him well and pledge our support.”

ICT has learned from more tribal officials that EchoHawk has been reaching out, trying to get similar endorsements, while calming the waters surrounding his past.

After talking over their concerns with EchoHawk, leaders of the Nez Perce Tribe also decided to send a letter to Obama.

“We are aware of the concerns surrounding Mr. EchoHawk’s position on gaming, but we are confident that such concerns will be squarely addressed in the confirmation hearing,” Samuel Penney, chairman of the tribe, wrote.

Confidence that EchoHawk has changed his views came directly as a result of talks with him, tribal officials said.

Whatever EchoHawk said during the conversations, he seems to have done a convincing job.

Penney wrote in his letter that he is “very up-to-date and familiar with tribal issues, including sovereignty, treaty rights and the federal trust responsibility.”

“Although we had our differences when Mr. Echohawk was representing state interests, he was always willing to discuss issues of concern,” the chairman added.

Other tribes, including the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Idaho, have released statements of support for EchoHawk. It isn’t known how many tribes he has reached out to.

EchoHawk told ICT Feb. 4 he would publicly comment on his past positions – and the controversies they have spawned – if appointed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Lois J. Edwards 1/2 Concow-Maidu said on Tuesday, May 12 at 1:45 PM

Dear Mr. EchoHawk as you know gaming has become a million dollar business. Why have tribes been downsizing their membership? I can give you the answer, to promote certain individuals to be the only people eligible to recieve (Per Captia) unearned income from the profits of the Casino. Why do I say this its because in 1989 I was accepted as a lineal member of Mooretown Rancheria Butte Co Ca Then in 2005 I was reclassified as a non-lineal status so my family and I do not recieve no income now.

21312462
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

SouthWest said on Monday, May 11 at 11:56 AM

Mr. Echohawk is going to have to balance Indian and non-Indian needs. He's working for the federal government, not for the tribes only. When he was Attorney General of Idaho, he had to represent the everyone, not just one group. None of us should ever expect to get everything we want from a person who is in this kind of position. It will always be a balancing act for them, and they just have to try to do the best they can do. When did gambling start to define Indian issues?

21251614
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Mari Wilson said on Monday, May 11 at 11:39 AM

Mr. EchoHawk was right to question tribal gaming. I'm Shawnee, living in California near a large Indian casino. The problems this casino has caused in our town are numerous. Not too long ago, a woman shot her husband as he was headed out to the casino again, because he was gamblng all their money away. It's just sad that the only we can think of to get ahead in the world is with a business that preys on people. Gambling is just plain bad for human beings.

21250602
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

orrin.allen@nezpercesystems.com said on Tuesday, Feb 17 at 2:35 PM

i CAN NOT VOICE ANYTHING RIGHT NOW, SINCE OUR TRIBE IS BACKING HIM FOR THE BIA JOB?

16639812
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

dontno said on Friday, Feb 13 at 3:45 PM

How is Echohawk going to make tribes stop internal politics of hire and fire like shobans misuse federal money and other tribes nationwide too! Talk about clean up!!!

16477182
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Rezkin wmn said on Thursday, Feb 12 at 11:28 AM

As usual, our silent majority isn't saying anything as is the norm. As usual, the national government is dividing and conquering. why can't we remember the old saying, stick together, it's harder to put you down when everyone stands as one. let's hold up our main man n see what kind of life he can make for our children, as Sitting Bull once said.

16393962
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

anonymous said on Wednesday, Feb 11 at 5:40 AM

We can then only pray that the Creator will guide him in his decision and choices; and that he is not speaking out of both sides of his mouth. Remember who he is and who his people are.

16322522
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

ThisTrain said on Tuesday, Feb 10 at 7:35 PM

When fighting for a position, a lot of natives like to appeal for a united native front. Once in that position, those who have appealed for unity forget all about natives standing together. Mr Echohawk has sided with the state against other natives before and there is no reason to doubt he won't do it again. Except now his stands will affect more than natives in one state; it will affect all of us. Why should we support something like that? We live with the consequences-not him nor his friends.

16305429
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

A pretty Indian GirLLL!! said on Tuesday, Feb 10 at 3:54 PM

When we as a tribal people defeat with each other negative comments we defeat ourselves. Any Indian to handle Indian Affairs is better than a non-Indian. Who has no concept of Indian vital issues. Kudos to him for the chance to be nominated!!!

16291579
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Mike said on Tuesday, Feb 10 at 3:45 PM

I'm not certain if this is the right decision for the Obama administration to make. There are clearly issues with Tribes around the world. And to appoint someone with a history of wrong doing, is not the answer. I think there would be a more logical choice until Mr. EchoHawk has has the time to be able to prove his loyalties and his stance. Actions speak louder than words. It's doesn't matter how many times you apologize for something, until you prove that you've changed. Than you haven't

16291074
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Edward said on Monday, Feb 9 at 6:33 PM

So let me get this straight: EchoHawk is now apologizing for his anti-Indian gaming efforts, now that he is seeking to be the head of the BIA! What has he done since leaving the AG's Office to support Indian gaming?

16243224
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

old ndn said on Monday, Feb 9 at 4:54 PM

Find somebody else.

16238244
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Gerald Warner said on Saturday, Feb 7 at 2:49 PM

Our Past speaks loudly but we all have rights to turn wrongs around and make good on our words and actions. Mr. EchoHawk is no different and will be watched by all concerned. The US Government has shown in past it's two faces. Mr. EchoHawk has shown recently the efforts to right the IIM Accounts for all Tribes and the US Government has not changed as to get the enemy on there side to quiet the oposition to their wrong doings. As we all have seen the words of politicians change after getting in.

16164579
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

anonymous said on Friday, Feb 6 at 2:31 AM

What specifically will he do to support sovereignty? Inouye has demonstrated that he truly supports Tribal Sovereignty. In light of the fact that so many states are making "legal" arguments against tribes in so many areas, how does mr.echohawk plan to support sovereignty when he elearly does not have the record to back it up. I guess thats the question he will need to be fed during his vetting, and during his hearing. Do they even question him during his vetting?

16105549
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand