Tools

Tribes finding way to economic prosperity

Economic development is one of the great challenges of contemporary indigenous peoples. The world has become a globalized marketplace, and most contemporary economic sustainability requires access to markets, but also the ability to own and profit from significant scale production according to the demands of the market. Indian peoples have long been associated with the processes of market globalization.

U.S. Indian policy has emphasized small farming with the various allotment acts, or migration to urban areas for wage-labor employment.

The most significant early relation between North American Indians and European colonists was the fur trade. Indians, however, were not owners of production; at best they were workers for trading posts, or local traders. Indians did not accept the market values of producing goods to maximize individual profit or exploiting the supplies of fur bearing animals for personal gain. Indians quickly became dependent on European goods, and found it necessary to supply furs and exploit animals according to the demands and needs of their European fur trading partners.

American Indians are looking to develop sustainable cultural and political communities, and many now think that without market related economies, tribal communities will have great difficulty obtaining cultural or political autonomy. Dependency on federal funds limits decision making capacities of individuals and tribal governments, while control over economic resources enhances the possibilities to make and implement culturally informed community decision making.

Some of the most successful tribal communities are those that have maintained or acquired a sustainable economic niche. The so-called Five Civilized Tribes of the American South during the 1820s to 1900 took up agriculture, cotton marketing and cattle raising. The tribes of the Pacific Northwest have benefitted from fishing markets, although they often lost fishing rights and territories. Plains tribes lost the buffalo and were forced onto reservations primarily for economic reasons rather than military reasons.

Tribal communities are finding
innovative ways to use the
marketplace for creating wealth.

Tribes that lost their economic base or fur trade relations were often politically and economically marginalized and then placed on small reservations. Some tribes have sold or leased farm land, natural resources like coal, uranium, timber, and more recently, gaming. While tribes with natural resources and gaming revenue have had mixed success, those ventures do not necessarily lead to greater education and development of skills for successful market participation, or cultural renewal.

U.S. Indian policy has emphasized small farming with the various allotment acts, or migration to urban areas for wage-labor employment. Very little policy was devoted to strengthening collective tribal enterprises, or significantly strengthening tribal institutional capabilities to foster economic entrepreneurship. As early as the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act tribes have had the option to form tribal corporations, but few ever adopted the IRA corporate plan. Nowadays, many tribes have adopted tribal corporations, but ones of their own creation, often adapted to the social and cultural institutions of their own communities.

Tribal communities now choose combinations of traditional subsistence economy, individual entrepreneurship and tribally-owned enterprises or corporations. The direct adoption of Western-style individual capitalist enterprise is not acceptable to most tribal communities. The pathway to economic sustainability will require reconciling the demands of the marketplace with the cultural institutions, worldviews, and political processes of tribal communities. Tribal communities are finding innovative ways to use the marketplace for creating wealth, but at the same time many prefer to own, operate and distribute wealth in collective ways that preserve and strengthen tribal identity and political community.

The most significant early relation between North American Indians and European colonists was the fur trade.

So far economic success in Indian country is decidedly uneven, largely the result of varied opportunities, since all tribal cultures and institutions are not compatible with Western market institutions and culture. As Native organizations devoted to fostering relationships between tribal businesses grow, sustained economic prosperity is certain to become the norm and not the exception.

Monday, Mar 1 at 2:12 AM Hustler.... wrote ...

The article seems to emphasize the old theory of proposing economic development progress on or within the exterior boundaries of Native nations. This old concept has proven time and time to be unworkable and not feasible, given the many barriers stagnating economic development progress. It is time, everyone understands this and plan for options, primarily starting business ventures off of the Native nations lands. There are much more opportunities in mainstream America, business ventures in cities, towns and rural areas. Get of the idea that economic development must take place locally - after all technology puts all things at our fingertips.

38447996
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Feb 13 at 10:50 PM Lucia wrote ...

I am not a Native but I found your article interesting. My question is, would an economic depression and the resulting cuts in Federal Indian programs, help wean some members of the Native communities off Federal help? I don't want to sound mean about this, but have the tribal members considered the possibility of a severe contraction of the Federal government as a result of another Great Depression? Many economists are predicting one is on the way and those that believe it are preparing to survive it.

37569691
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Feb 13 at 5:45 PM R Mazer wrote ...

Hope to see great changes and prosperity coming for this communities

37561118
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 2:45 PM Shoshoni wrote ...

Inter-tribal markets should be working but are not. Most tribes are still hung up on federal habits, i.e., FAR procurement rules, preference, etc., and are overzealous in applying them. Tribes also need to conduct economic social restructuring of their IRA governing documents.

37375704
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand