Tools

Apaches request Interior NAGPRA review

By Rob Capriccioso

WASHINGTON – A group of Apache historic preservation officers is alleging that the National Park Service is improperly implementing the Native American Graves and Repatriation Act.

In a letter sent to Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar in September, the Western NAGPRA working group said the NPS is allowing improper cataloguing of sacred and holy tribal items.

The working group is composed of NAGPRA representatives from the San Carlos Apache Tribe, the White Mountain Apache Tribe, the Tonto Apache Tribe, and the Yavapai-Apache Nation.

NAGPRA is a federal law passed in 1990, which created a legal process for museums, federal agencies and institutions that receive federal funding to return American Indian human remains and cultural items to respective tribes or lineal descendants.

Many of the authorities under the law are delegated to the NPS, which lies in the Interior Department.

According to the letter, instances have occurred where museums have identified items as “cultural items” when they should in fact be called “sacred objects,” “objects of cultural patrimony” or both, as set forth in the law.

The distinction is important, the officers said, because it affects the status of the items and could impact their ability to get the items back in a timely manner.

“An acknowledgment that items are both sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony is an admission that a museum, at a minimum, has items that are not rightfully their property, or, at a maximum, that a museum was at least party to wrongdoing,” the letter said.

“Such an admission would provide a measure of justice and peace of mind to Apache communities that were wronged so many years ago.”

D. Bambi Kraus, president of the National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, said the Apaches view the proper implementation of NAGPRA as a matter of civil rights.

“For a healing process to occur, they want the proper designation made,” said the Tlingit Alaskan Native. “I think that makes sense.

“NAGPRA calls for that process to happen, so it should be happening.”

Salazar has yet to respond to the letter, but the issue was scheduled to be on the agenda of a national NAGPRA review committee meeting held in Florida.

Earlier in October, Steve Titla, a lawyer for the San Carlos Apache Tribe, raised the issue at a hearing of the House Committee on Natural Resources focused on faulty NAGPRA implementation.

Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W. Va., said he and Sen. Byron Dorgan, D.-N.D., have requested a Government Accountability Office study on federal agency compliance with NAGPRA and research on how appropriated funds are being used.

Monday, Nov 2 at 6:05 PM Big Chief wrote ...

Who do we report to, if for instance a shady NAGPRA Representative, is actually keeping an article for his own personal gain ? its been a few years and this character still has it in his possesion. Criminal Act maybe?

31484121
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Monday, Nov 2 at 1:39 PM Teague wrote ...

Objects subject to NAGPRA must be classed as sacred objects or objects of cultural patrimony according to very specific legal criteria. NPS application of those criteria is apparently the source of the current dispute, rather than a claim that NPS has not engaged in consultation with relevant tribes. This seems to be an attempt by to clarify important differences that have arisen during those consultations.

31470286
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Sunday, Nov 1 at 6:15 PM Phil Stago, Jr.- Arizona wrote ...

The Apache keepers of our sacred objects have done an excellent job in returning and protecting or sacred patrimony. I know they have traveled long and wide, even into foriegn countries to recover our property. This is one thing we have done right. Thanks to the agressiveness of Ramon Rily of Ft. Apache, Vincent Randal of Camp Verde and others. We are proud of you and your dedication.

31429207
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, Oct 30 at 3:29 PM Phoenix Navajo wrote ...

One of the prime, if not the prime, reasons that there is not full consultation is lack of funds to implement NAGPRA. There are thousands of material cultural items in perhaps hundreds of museums. Imagine every tribe trying to visit every place, to see everything. There are ways, but it simply comes down to funding. Time and time again, laws are passed, but who's going to pay for implementation and enforcement. In short, patience is needed, as well as dialog in a positive manner.

31348623
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, Oct 30 at 2:19 PM hummingbird wrote ...

did the NPS include indigenous viewpoints from appropriate tribe(s)when cataloguing sacred items? Over and over again, indigenous people are often excluded in important matters related to them. why? it appears that wannabes and non-natives like to continue to keep control. narcissism, ignorance, status, prestige, $,..

31344998
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand