Tools

Coulter: Obama: Make a fresh commitment to indigenous peoples

By Robert T. Coulter

When President Obama meets with Indian and Alaska Native leaders Nov. 5, he should announce that he will embrace the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and work to adopt an American Declaration on the human rights of Native nations. As a starting point for improving the situation of Native nations, this country needs to affirm the fundamental rights of Native nations and individuals. It is a disgrace that the United States has not done so. The U.S. was one of just four countries to vote against the UN Declaration two years ago, and the United States is still following the Bush Administration orders not to negotiate on the American Declaration that is nearing completion in the Organization of American States.

Without a clear public commitment to respect fundamental rights, there is not likely to be any substantial change in the federal government’s continuing discriminatory and unjust treatment of Indian and Alaska Native nations. Without such a commitment to human rights, including treaty rights and federal constitutional rights, federal programs will be little more than temporary measures that can never overcome the economic hardship and deprivation that Native peoples endure. If there were a federal commitment to fundamental justice, Native nations could have a fair chance of overcoming the generations of federal mistreatment and mismanagement.

As a starting point for improving the situation of Native nations, this country needs to affirm the fundamental rights of Native nations and individuals.

The White House should make that commitment and reverse the Bush policy of rejecting all measures for indigenous human rights. Native leaders deserve an answer Nov. 5 – a real commitment to respect the human rights of Native nations – and the best way to do this is to endorse the UN Declaration. Leaders of many Indian nations in the United States have demanded this for years, and they will surely demand it Nov. 5 as well.

Despite the pretended reasons for voting against the Declaration, the U.S. representatives at the UN publically agreed to practically all of the provisions of the UN Declaration. In the open negotiations, the U.S. delegation repeatedly voiced its support for most of the rights in the Declaration, because almost all these rights are already a part of United States law or are required by the U.S. Constitution.

Some of the provisions concerning land rights were actually proposed by the United States. The U.S. vote against the Declaration was dictated by the Bush policy of rejecting all new human rights commitments, not because of serious opposition to the provisions of the Declaration. The U.S. objections were hardly more than a cover story for voting “no” on human rights. The Obama administration should promptly reverse that stupid policy.

For many generations, the federal government has kept Native nations begging yearly for support to meet the crying human needs on reservations – while never making a formal commitment to respect the most basic rights to fairness, equality before the law, respect for treaty commitments, and self-determination.

I hope Obama will take this opportunity to reverse the senseless Bush policy and truly embrace the UN Declaration and the developing American Declaration.

Native leaders have little choice but to lobby constantly for programs and appropriations that can provide jobs and other relief for desperate human needs in Indian communities. Leaders are also forced to seek “fixes” for seemingly endless new problems caused by federal wrong-doing related to their lands, their resources, their money and their self-government. But to end this sad cycle, Native leaders are also demanding – and they deserve – real respect for the fundamental rights that others enjoy, including the human rights contained in the UN Declaration.

I hope Obama will take this opportunity to reverse the senseless Bush policy and truly embrace the UN Declaration and the developing American Declaration.

And by the way, the OAS will have a negotiating session on the American Declaration in Washington, D.C. Nov. 30 – Dec. 2. I urge Indian and Alaska Native leaders to be there and participate in the negotiations. The Obama administration needs to be there too with a fresh and positive commitment to human rights for indigenous peoples.

Robert T. Coulter is executive director of Indian Law Resource Center.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Art Fisher said on Saturday, Nov 7 at 4:44 PM

Obama = FAIL on Nov 5th. The happy rhetoric on nation-to-nation partnership continues. Where's the real prospect of federal-tribal partnership when the Federal element refuses to formally acknowledge fundamental tribal human rights, as nearly all of the world's countries readily did. Lets see an indication of genuine commitment in the form of joinder in the U.N. Declaration and getting behind the OAS Document BEFORE Adoption.

31756521
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Saturday, Nov 7 at 4:43 PM

Obama = FAIL on Nov 5th. The happy rhetoric on nation-to-nation partnership continues. Where's the real prospect of federal-tribal partnership when the Federal element refuses to formally acknowledge fundamental tribal human rights, as nearly all of the world's countries readily did. Lets see an indication of genuine commitment in the form of joinder in the U.N. Declaration and getting behind the OAS Document BEFORE Adoption.

31756494
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wise One said on Friday, Oct 23 at 1:40 AM

Indigenous is a general term which combines many different cultures into one "Big Melting Pot", which like America, totally destroys our individual tribal uniqueness and identity. Who comprises these Indigenous identities when you consider the multitudes around the world? The UN has to make general policy definitions for these Indigenous people for human problem resolution. Similar to the American melting pot, we must resisted this and the traditions of individual Native groups must remain.

30989803
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Keep it REAL said on Thursday, Oct 22 at 6:01 PM

To Phillip Edward: If you are interested in the real meaning of the word "arbitrary", then I would suggest reading Chief Justice John Marshall's statement in Johnson v. M'Intosh ruling. Or simply read Newcomb’s book, "Pagans in the Promised Land: Decoding the Doctrine of Christian Discovery."

30974333
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Phillip Edward said on Thursday, Oct 22 at 10:59 AM

The problem with these indigenous nations resolutions is that there is no workable definition of who the indigenous people are, it is made up a an arbitrary vote of current nations, each of which is totally biased toward current events. When you partner with terrorists, as this resolution does, then you will get not reasonable people to help

30951437
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Larry Hamana, Hopi-Tewa Civil Rights Advocate said on Wednesday, Oct 21 at 12:13 PM

The Hopi-Tewa People on our reservation in AZ pray that President Obama and his team help to reinstate our human and civil rights against an illegal Hopi tribal council's atrocities and civil rights violations imposed on us as an indigenous people. This would be a real test case for Obama to investigate and overturn for the benefit of my people.

30900992
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Gerad Kipp said on Wednesday, Oct 21 at 9:21 AM

I hope the UN Declaration has a component on the Supreme Court Rulings that effect all tribes with one blow, when each and every tribe has different policies set in place. Such as Treaty Tribes, non-Treaty Tribes, Executive Order Tribes, IRA tribes, Non-IRA Tribes, PL280 tribes, partial PL280 Tribes, Corparations, Rancereas, and the combinations of all thes different policies that govern the tribes as a single soverign unit.

30888977
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand