Story Published:
Oct 9, 2009
Story Updated:
Oct 9, 2009
Many years ago I started a personal research project on what it meant to “Think Indian” or more specifically “Think Lakota or Cheyenne.”
I was working with learning-challenged students at the University of Colorado-Boulder in the University Learning Center. I was also working with American Indian students at various academic levels and saw the unique cognitive challenges they were having in mainstream academia. All of these students were very intelligent and scored high enough on the ACT to be admitted to the University of Colorado, but were challenged by the academic methodology and pedagogy.
While teaching in the American Indian Upward Bound Science and Self-Determination program, I realized my students were cognitively processing information differently. I learned to teach to their cognitive strengths.
Throughout my life, I often heard people say, “You Indian people are different.” Although their meaning was derogatory, inside I knew we were different in some way. I have known many intellectually talented Indian people in my life. Many were unrecognized geniuses, sometimes only possessing an eighth grade education. I began to wonder why these brilliant people, my heroes, unsuccessful in their academic pursuits.
I decided to conduct my own research on cognitive processing and how Indian people think. My first task was to learn as much as I could about the brain and how it works. My research revealed that all human brains are the same. They function in the exact same way for every living human being. A person’s ethnic background or race does not physiologically affect cognitive processing. Attributes for learning capacity are identical in all human beings. The only exception is when a person suffers a brain injury or significant cognitive processing issues related to a condition or disease, such as autism or Alzheimer’s.
I continued my self-guided research intent on exploring how and why Indian people think differently. Cognitive processing is the way the brain processes information it receives from all internal and external stimuli. All brains process information the same way. So why do Indian people think differently?
Using the analogy of two different computers functioning as brains, the computers have the same operating systems and the same ability to process data (cognitive processing). The difference in “thinking” originates in the software that is applied to the computer (brain). The software for Indians and Western Europeans differs significantly. The software for Indian people uses oral communication as the central mode for learning. This “thinking process” is enhanced by visual observations and practical applications in an experiential mode. There is a much greater reliance on intuition and in some cases a higher level of mental telepathic communication.
There is and has been significant evidence that describes the ability to communicate with animals, plants and Mother Earth. I have watched as an elderly man would stand facing into the wind and accurately predict the weather for the next few days. When I asked how he did this, he explained that the wind carries information, the trees and plants know what to expect and behave accordingly, the clouds reveal what is happening in the upper atmosphere, and he can sense changes in barometric pressures. This is not something you can teach in a classroom.
The difficulty in understanding the complexity of the cognitive process used is part of the problem of finding workable classroom solutions that will enhance the academic preparation of our students. I see students who are “Indian thinkers” excel in mainstream academia because somehow they have created cognitive interactive software that allows them to learn in any environment. We need to learn more about how they are able to do this.
As I continue to study “Indian thinking,” I believe there is a natural intuitive learning process that originated in our ancestors and is passed from generation to generation. This is the same for all people. Just as kernels of corn have genetic instructions that, when planted, allow them to produce a fully functional plant with leaves, stalks, silk, certain patterns of kernel alignment, color, and many other characteristics, people have the same inherited codes that define who they are physically and mentally.
Over the years the environment and human interaction significantly affected the inherited traits of individuals. I believe thinking Indian is not just a philosophical approach, it is a cognitive process. If American Indian people ever stop “thinking Indian,” we will become cognitively extinct.
There has been significant research related to Indian students and learning modalities, styles and specialized pedagogy, but it is often juxtaposed with Western theories of learning and cognitive processing. The tribal colleges have intrinsically become centers of “Indian thinking” and need to continue their practices and research to improve American Indian
student outcomes.
Richard B. Williams is the president and CEO of the American Indian College Fund, the nation’s largest provider of private scholarships for American Indian students seeking to better their lives and communities through a college education at the nation’s 33 accredited tribal colleges and universities.
Tuesday, Oct 20 at 2:31 PM Donna wrote ...
Awwwwwe... great article! I MISS AIUB!!! Too much fun and the experience was great. Loving the FB page!!
30854683 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Tuesday, Oct 20 at 3:26 AM Najin wrote ...
wambli, "red nationalist" ? isnt a traditional way of thinking or frame of reference, for any tribe, you make me laugh, you borrow terms from whites all the while attempting to discredit it. Oh, and this article is pretty much junk pseudo-science. If "thinking indian" means relying on intuition more than logic, which is your basic premise, I see that you've relied on "indian thinking" in proving your theories rather than real science. "Why do Indian people think differently?" huh?
30828431 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Friday, Oct 16 at 10:05 AM Keeka wrote ...
I enjoyed this article very much. Please continue professional research on this to help Native students and non Natives understand this difference better. Thank you!
30669652 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Wednesday, Oct 14 at 10:09 AM Mary wrote ...
I concur with your thesis. I recently retired after specializing in "remedial" and "special ed" instruction, the best job in the whole world for me. The cultural/spiritual framework that students use to make sense of the world can determine/expand/limit/bless their interaction with information. "Indian thinking" is a powerful framework, a gift really, and is not a deterrent to successful leaning in a setting that is respectful and ACCOUNTABLE for the success of ALL learners. Blessings!!
30558563 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Wednesday, Oct 14 at 12:22 AM Wise One wrote ...
Although the article generalizes cognitive learning differences for college level American Indians, it touches on the theory of "Think Indian". All brains are not similar during the developmental years, which theoretically separates the American Indian through cogitative development-there has been enough empirical studies completed throughout the years that have determined advantages such as environment, nutrition, hereditary, etc., which in most cases differ with the AI upbringing.
30540997 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Tuesday, Oct 13 at 11:48 AM Cecil, Avihamok wrote ...
Indians inherently think different because of their language, which is collective—one word—is a whole story in itself. The students who are “Indian Thinkers” and excel; simply stay focus on the task at hand…using his or her “Indian Thinking” to understand the topic and return to the task at hand. The problem I think is not “Indian Thinking” conflicting with the way subjects are taught, but the lack of “Indian Thinking” which enables a person to perceive and conceptualize. Point: Being Ind
30511963 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Tuesday, Oct 13 at 12:17 AM BKing wrote ...
I think a lot of ndns drop out of college for philosophical reasons, which Mr Williams alluded to in the column. The work itself isnt hard, but when you look at the post college options, it's easy to get demoralized when the path points to "success" being measured in how assimilated we can become. A lot of people can't reconcile values of community vs individual interest. A bunch of ndns come in interested in the law and then lose interest once they find out we can't win that way, for example.
30494442 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Monday, Oct 12 at 7:39 PM Tay wrote ...
I think the Indian involves a lot more of the environment in their thinking, and this results in different, more informed conclusions than the whites. I have a hard time with their world because so many of their conclusions are so wrong.
30486662 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Monday, Oct 12 at 6:22 PM Wanbli wrote ...
This is a very good article. It’s not thinking Indian; however, it’s thinking Red Nationalist, its thinking as the oppressed, not as the conquerior. Its, not thinking in make believe or the illusions of Americanism, her rewards and her world views. It’s thinking with and objective and subjective aboriginal mind that is consious of its systematic cultural holocaust taking place at the moment, among his or hers red nation hoods on our sovereign lands. This is Reality!
30484218 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Monday, Oct 12 at 3:04 PM Leonore Hata wrote ...
I definitely concurr with the findings of your extensive studies, it makes very good sense and I congratulate your efforts to keep striving to find ways to teach Indian children. My Hawaiian friend, who also happens to be a female gynecologist, would term it as learning to compensate as needed in learning. I believe that if a child has good self-esteem and has average to above average intelligence combined with a good work ethic, they can find tools to "compensate" learning in a diff. way.
30475853 Inappropriate? Alert Us!Add a comment
Most Popular